User talk:Seaweed/Archive 1

Latest Brighton article improvements
Hi! It's nice to see you back and keeping an eye on the Brighton article.

I'd like to tweak a couple of your changes today, but thought I'd run them by you first. It seems a shame to lose the fact that the Lanes do follow some of the street pattern of the original fishing settlement. (I'm presuming you haven't come up with anything that says that is a myth?) And I'd like to reinstate or replace some of the wording which mentioned the early settlement in that context.

And as for Atlingworth... interesting. I'm particularly interested cos my Brighton address is on Atlingworth Street. I have seen a map (I think it was a 1904 one, in an atlas of England, but I'll need to check) labelling the area as a Laine, so the Manor reference is not, perhaps, mutually exclusive. Does your source shed more detail on this? In the absense of a categorical disproof, I think a published map is good enough source material to justify putting the Laine reference back. Whadya reckon? – Kieran T  ( talk  20:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi Kieran, sorry for the delay in responding. Been a bit busy. When I researched the Domesday entry for Brighton, I'm pretty certain I read about "Atlingworth" being in recongnition of one the ancient manors. However, I must admit I have no source to verify this with. Hmm. I'll try and find out in better detail. However, I'm pretty certain that the only laines were: Little Laine, Hilly Laine, West Laine and North Laine. Possibly East Laine. I think Little Laine was where sort of St James's Street is around. I'll research and get back to you. Although my bold outpouring of opinion of the Brighton talk page might not be followed up with much action from me at the moment. I'm trying to just work on Wikipedia once a week otherwise it'll take over my life! --Seaweed 16:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I found the source I was after. In the Historical Atlas of Sussex(p.94), there is a map of Brighton parish c.1740 which has been prepared from some other sources. The area is divided into:
 * "Town" (bounded by West Street, North Street, The Steine and the sea)
 * West Laine (west of West Street up to Hove parish)
 * North Laine (north of North Street up to Preston Parish)
 * Hilly Laine (sort-of Islingword Road accross to Queens Park Road down to Edward Street)
 * Little Laine (quite small, just east of the Steine to about Rock Gardens, and
 * East Laine (beyond Little Laine to about Lewes Crescent and north to the Bristol Estate).
 * So no Atlingworth Laine I'm afraid. I'm still pretty certain Atlingworth originates regarding one of the ancient manors, but I'm still scratching my head on where I read that. --Seaweed 21:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Interesting stuff – thanks for remembering and coming back to it :-) – Kieran T  ( talk  22:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Whitehawk
I've added a full history of Whitehawk, as someone who has an interest in Brighton articles, I'd really appreciate it if you could do a proof read for me at some point. Feel free to correct anything that needs it. I am planning on expanding the Brighton Marina article as my next project. If your interested, I also put in an article on the legendary Peter Ward, found at Peter Ward (English footballer), although I desperately need a picture of him in Brighton kit that is eligible to be uploaded to wikipedia! Thanks. Fork me 09:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

New WikiProject for Brighton
Hi. If you read this, user:Kierant suggested I should contact you as someone who has put in a lot of work on Brighton-related articles. Thanks to the initiative of user:Unisouth, there is a new WikiProject for Brighton and Hove articles. Getting new members is an urgent task and if you wanted to join it would be very welcome indeed. However, I appreciate that you may not be contributing much or at all at the moment. Best wishes. Itsmejudith 16:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Jim_Moray.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jim_Moray.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:June_Tabor.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:June_Tabor.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 13:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Early doors4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Early doors4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Night-life and popular music of Brighton and Hove
I have nominated Night-life and popular music of Brighton and Hove, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Night-life and popular music of Brighton and Hove. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Brighton Racecourse
Dear Seaweed, I would like to understand why you have deleted so much of my text on this subject. There may have only been a few citations, but the material was all from the book I wrote about the history of the course and I saw no point in repeatedly citing the same source. There is no copyright issue as regards the similar text on the racecourse website; I wrote it for them using information from the book. I am a novice on Wikipedia and appreciate I may not know all the rules, but your help in clarifying this would be appreciated. Ravel59 (talk) 13:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Ryan Collinson article, thank you.
Seaweed, I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your recent contribution in adding internal link references to the Ryan Collinson article I created not too long ago. My forte is writing and most decidedly not technical expertise, which is typical of my generation. So I always appreciate any help I can get on that front.

I have no interest whatsoever in this particular subject. I’m not English. However, when I happened upon a video of Mr. Collinson reprising his Billy Elliot performance, I thought he was exceptionally good. When I saw that there was no Wikipedia article for him as yet, I finally saw my chance to actually create an article rather than simply editing articles as I have done often (usually to correct typos and grammatical errors). Since many other Billy Elliot performers had articles, I thought it appropriate, especially as he had the West End title/lead role. I liked the idea of creating an article about one so young; sort of getting in on the ground floor. I do think that with young Mr. Collinson’s tremendous talent and photogenic appearance that—assuming such is his desire—he has a real shot of making it big in entertainment one day. Therefore, I hope the humble article I created will grow over the years and that I might take a small measure of pride in the “anonymous notability” I might have achieved, perhaps similar to the feeling of whomever started the article on, for example, Taylor Swift and that the article will endure long after I’m gone!

Thanks again, Seaweed, and if you have more interest in British theater than I do, I hope you will keep tabs on the subject and perhaps consider adding substantive material as the subject’s professional resume hopefully blossoms with time! Best regards.HistoryBuff14 (talk) 14:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Daniel Hill, actor, publicity shot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Hill, actor, publicity shot.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Emanuele Santi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Italian


 * Husayn Muruwwa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Lebanese


 * Shea Heights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Newfoundland

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1 Blackfriars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Columbus tower
Thank you seaweed for the update. I have a interest in buildings and construction, so try too add my bit :). It would be brilliant and very helpful if you could assist me with some help. I'm currently making a list of buildings over the height of 150 metres (skyscraper), it is called, List of cities by number of skyscrapers. It is situated on the page ,List of cities with the most skyscrapers. I have made a header titled, List of cities by number of skyscrapers. Then below it it I have constructed a table to list cities in order of how many skyscrapers they have. However for some reason the table I have constructed skips my header and lies below the next header. I wondered if you know why this happens and could possibly fix the problem.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logicgold (talk • contribs) 03:17, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wood Wharf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Farrell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

reply
Hi, i replied to you on my talk page

Orphaned non-free image File:Artist&#39;s impression of the proposed building at the Newfoundland site, Isle of Dogs, London, UK.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Artist&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlie Sloth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giggs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 69-71 Bondway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KPF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hertsmere House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HOK. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roffey Park Institute
Hello Seaweed,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Roffey Park Institute for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lithopsian (talk) 16:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Baltimore Tower Artist Impression OShea.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Baltimore Tower Artist Impression OShea.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of One Park Drive


The article One Park Drive has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable not-yet-existing residential skyscraper, non-notable, doesn't meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 17:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (One Park Drive) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating One Park Drive, Seaweed!

Wikipedia editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for your contribution"

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 21:16, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyright on King Edward Tower
Thanks for updating the article. I've had to remove one sentence that was a direct copy from an external source. I've added the template from WP:CV101 to the talk page including a link to the original source it came from. Please make sure to rewrite everything you add to articles or, if the specific wording is what is important, include it as a direct quotation, including quotation marks and a reference. There's more detail at WP:COPYRIGHT. Mortee (talk) 07:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Artist's impression of KPG designed 52-54 Lime Street.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Artist's impression of KPG designed 52-54 Lime Street.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. the wub "?!"  23:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Message for Seaweed
I posted the following on the Mark Haysom Talk page on February 7th. I now realise this must have been a mistake – for you to have sight of it, I should, perhaps, have posted it on your own Talk page. Apologies.

This was the message:

(This is my first time on Wikipedia other than as a user and I’m not at all sure I’m posting this correctly or indeed in the right place. I’m trying to get the following message to Seaweed and any help in bringing it to his/her attention is appreciated.)

I thought I should let you know that your intervention on this article has been drawn to my attention. If I can be of help in any way, please feel free to email me at mark@mark-haysom.co.uk. In the meantime, you should know that I have been embarrassed about this article since its first appearance. You must, of course, edit it as you see fit or (as has always been my wish) remove it altogether! MARKH1953 (talk) 09:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

What I would add now to that original message is that I think I’m able to shed at least a little light on the identity of one of the article’s principal authors/editors. Please do email me at mark@mark-haysom.co.uk if this would be helpful.

MARKH1953 (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you
I am delighted that this has been resolved. Thank you. I can now stop blundering about in a Wikipedia world I don’t understand and stop worrying about this article. It does feel as if a weight has been lifted from me - particularly with the offending accounts being blocked to prevent the possibility of any further issues - and I’m truly grateful for that. Finally, I meant no harm, of course, in suggesting an email exchange. I was simply keen to avoid a discussion on a public forum. Thank you again. MARKH1953 (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Artist&#39;s impression of One Park Drive - London - Herzog &#38; de Meuron.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Artist&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Global Gathering 2005 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Gathering 2005, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Global Gathering 2005 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

David Bangs article
Hello Seaweed, I have only known of him since December and have only met David once to buy one of his book. I have exchanged some emails so I could make the Wikipedia page. He has been influential in many policy decisions that have led to our Downs staying public (owned by the council). He was also well known for his murals in London. He appeared on the TV and the radio many times and hosted his own programme which was recommended in a number of national newspapers. He has been integral to campaign groups that have prevented many acres of Sussex Downland from being privatised, including much of the land around world famous Seven Sisters. David's page is intended as a stub article and people who know David and his achievements better will build on it. David has had a large impact on land management of Sussex Downland in Sussex and his notability evidenced in the multiple sources I have provided. Paolo.oprandi (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:City Pride, Artist&#39;s impression 2012, Squire and Partners.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:City Pride, Artist&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Brighton in fiction for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brighton in fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brighton in fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Looking for feedback: Elliot Grainge draft
Hi Seaweed. I saw you’re a member of WikiProject Hip Hop. I created a draft article for music executive Elliot Grainge from 10K Projects - are you able to take a look and give me feedback?I work for Elliot, which I understand is a conflict of interest according to Wikipedia policy, so was hoping to get the assistance of an independent editor. The draft article is here:. Thanks. Musicfan100 (talk) 14:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello there. I didn't know I was a member of the WikiProject Hip Hop! I've never heard of it! Anyway, I'll be glad to help you. You've done a good job in writing up a draft article and I praise you for your honesty in stating your professional connection to Elliot Grainge and not creating the page yourself. Incidentally I edited the article about Lucian Grainge recently. I've actually been spending editing quite a lot of music industry Wikpedia articles recently (I've even got print copy of July edition of Music Week in front of me!), so you're request is quite interesting. (I don't work in the music industry, I'm just a music fan.)
 * I think the starting thing about biographicaly articles is Notability. The question is whether Elliot Grainge is notable enough to justify a whole article about him. The first thing that I noticed was that there is no existing article for 10K Projects. Therefore it wouldn't make much sense to create an article for Elliot before creating one for 10K Projects. Therefore the next question is whether 10K Projects is itself is "notable". If it is, it might be more efficient (to start with anyway) to include information about Elliot Grainge in a 10K Projects article. In due course, maybe Elliot would get his own article, if notable enough.
 * I've actually never heard of 10K Projects until today, but my very quick two minute scan of your draft article and the artists connected to 10K Projects makes me think it probably should have its own article. 10K Projects seems quite notable to me. I might actually go ahead a create that article, but I'll need to do some more research first. Maybe I'll then include some of the content from your draft article for Eliot Grainge into that article. Seaweed (talk) 15:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Illustration of proposed development at 69-71 Bondway, London (2014 design).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Illustration of proposed development at 69-71 Bondway, London (2014 design).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 06:32, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sayeeda Warsi, Baroness Warsi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alistair Campbell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ash Sarkar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Sorry for the template, but you are removing significant amounts of reliably-sourced content, while the article is under a revert restriction. Perhaps you can discuss the major changes you wish to make to this article on the article Talk page, including the significant context and sources you wish to remove, and explain the reasons why, before making these changes. Thank you,'' Beccaynr (talk) 15:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Hello Beccaynr. I think that's very unfair of you to give ma an unconstructive edit template about Ash Sarkar. All I've been doing is trying to improve the readability of the article and make it more encyclopedic. In fact, that's pretty much all I do on Wikipedia these days: just trying to simplify articles to help the casual reader. I don't even remember how I ended up on that article. I very rarely delete references, so left all that intact. I've been editing Wikipedia since 2005 I think, so do have some idea about policies and guidelines. It's not always necessary to have discussions on talk pages and topics where there isn't anything that contentious going on. I didn't notice any big debates going on the Talk page, with no edits since August 2022. If anything, I could argue that maybe you should have talked to me first, before assuming bad faith, but I don't mind really. It's sunny outside and it's only Wikipedia. Seaweed (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about templating you and the unintended implication that I was assuming bad faith - this article has had disruptive editing in the past, and I was concerned by what appear to me to be a series of removals of pertinent content after the article has been stable for awhile.
 * I respect your efforts and I hope you can forgive my clumsy attempt to call your attention to the edits - I have now opened sections on the article Talk page to discuss various aspects of the edits and hope you will further discuss the article there. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 16:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my slow reply, I'm a bit erratic when I log on to Wikipedia. No problem at all and I appreciate your thoughtful comments and your detailed responses on the article page. Seaweed (talk) 16:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you - I may not have the time or focus to reply on the article Talk page today, but my general sense (including based on the history of the article) is that Sarkar is a subject who benefits from well-sourced context, and I look forward to reviewing sources and further discussing the article with you. Thanks again, Beccaynr (talk) 16:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Funnily enough, sometimes when I remove excessive details/quotes from a biographical artcile, I challenge myself to go a find a new reference about that person that isn't in the article already. I feel that's me trying to help Wikipedia by not just being someone who removes thing, but adds things too. I'm going to see if I can find something new and notable abour Ash Sarkar right now! Seaweed (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've failed! I can't find anything additional to add apart from that she might have had some poems featured in some poetry anthologies, but I can't be certain it's definitely her. And if it is the same Ashna Sarkar, it's probably not that notable. Seaweed (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Children and Families Act 2014 moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Children and Families Act 2014. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow •  talk  00:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Artist&#39;s impression of 40 Leadenhall Street, London.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Artist&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Michelle Mone, Baroness Mone
Hi - just wanted to say thank you for trimming / simplifying a lot of the information in the above article. Was wondering whether you thought Controversies regarding COVID-19 contracts in the United Kingdom, which covers a lot of similar content, could also do with trimming / editing? (If not, please feel free to disregard my message). GnocchiFan (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I must admit this ongoing controversy is not something I've been paying much attention to, but as you say there is a lot of detail in that other page. I think a lot of editors, quite naturally I suppose, add references as these news stories develop. Then the articles end up too long. I've found they are almost easier to edit after the whole thing has concluded. I might take a look though if there are simple things to change. Seaweed (talk) 16:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Please don't depopulate categories for no reason
There are plenty of categories on this encyclopedia with one or two pages in them. You can think they're not necessary, but that's not a valid reason to depopulate a totally normal category. Noah Kahan already has two albums with articles and it looks like his career is only really just taking off, so there's reason to believe it will continue and he will make more. Your edits have been reverted; please don't restore the removals per WP:BRD. If you really have such an issue with the category existing (and I don't know why you do), then nominate it for deletion. Thanks.  Ss  112   21:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Children and Families Act 2014
Hello, Seaweed. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Children and Families Act 2014, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adam Garnet Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Far right
Please stop removing "far right" from articles. Discussions regarding the term appear on BLPN, NPOVN, and other noticeboards regularly, and the consensus has always been that it's appropriate when described that way by multiple reliable, secondary sources. The same is true of "far left" and other related terms. Woodroar (talk) 19:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I'll add my voice to the above, as well. Seaweed, I'm assuming all of your changes were manually done (i.e., not semi-automated), but this sort of en masse editing needs to be discussed beforehand. Neutralitytalk 19:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I concur with the above. This has all been discussed at length on BLPN and various talk pages. In addition, it may be an idea to hold off on making mass edits without any discussion - I've reverted a few of yours that were either reversions of content settled by RfCs or existing editor consensus, which mass edits like that don't take into account. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 19:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see! I just thought they were all mistakes or sort-of article drift as politicians seem to be normally just called "politicians" in the first sentence, whatever their politics.Seaweed (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello Seaweed. Invite you to join the discussion on the talk page here about removing far-right from an article lead.  I started a discussion and am looking for further input on the topic.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Gibbs_(government_official)#Removing_far-right_from_lead 24.236.158.2 (talk) 14:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi. Inviting you to join the discussion on the talk page here: Talk:John Gibbs (government official) 107.4.46.26 (talk) 13:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)