User talk:Seb26/Archive/6

Peer review/Age of Mythology/archive1
My last peer review took a month! Thanks for this :D Hope to see you back soon (if indeed you are on break/retired), from your overly loyal companion, Giggy  UCP 08:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If you retire I'll kill you. :P And you still haven't added my MSN!  Giggy  UCP 08:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * *sigh* I'll be offline in about 20 minutes (probably, unless mum decides she DOES love me after all and won't wring my neck). So give me yours, nooooooob!  Giggy  UCP 09:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * *mental note* - You really make my talk page look bad. Giggy  UCP 09:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Giggy
Your Strongest oppose was in the support section, so I moved it to the oppose section, but is that really what you meant? --Stephen1-800-STEVE 10:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm a terrible candidate, it was moved correctly. Right?  Giggy  UCP 00:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, lol. Sebi  &#91; talk &#93; 01:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Boinkz!
 Have you checked your mail lately, Mr. Anderson Spebi? Lotsa hugs! :)  P h a e d r i e l  10:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

GAC
GAC is a process for determining which articles are good articles per the good article criteria. It's very informal, but you basically stick your article in the appropriate section, and someone comes and reviews it (instructions are all on the page). Ask me if you need any more info. Giggy UCP 22:01, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks hugely...
...for reverting vandalism to my userpage...greatly appreciated :o) Drivenapart 07:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi, Spebi, and thanks for your participation in my RfA. I've withdrawn it, and will be writing up an "analysis" of it, which will soon be available at User:Giggy/RfA/Giggy when it's done. Please come around when you get the chance, and give me feedback on how I can improve. Strong oppose if you ever run for it :P Thanks again, Giggy  UCP 04:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

In regards to wikilinks
I had always thought it was supposed to be only one link per article, too. But in the Manual of Style (links) it says "Good places for link duplication are often the first time the term occurs in each article subsection" and that only one link can actually be underlinking in a long article. V-train 05:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Thanks for the experiment - and "hi!". But in future please voice your opinions elsewhere, especially Wikipedia: pages. Cheers! :-)'' Bennyboyz3000 05:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * False accusation – carry on. Sebi  &#91; talk &#93; 05:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Canberra
Thanks for the explanation. I lived in Canberra for 30 years before moving to Sydney 4 years ago, and the reasons I added the information are: - most people may be unaware that Canberra has produced those players (apart from the Canberra Raiders and Brumbies players) - the article on Canberra has a mix of history weaved into its sections, and this is important sports history for Canberra - Canberra is seen by many people outside the ACT as lacking character. Recognition of sporting success is a very good tool for countering this. I was also hoping that others may be inspired to add famous Canberrans to other sections of the article e.g. artists and entertainers, business people - If the list needs to be shortened then I would suggest sticking to O'Connor, Campese, Hird, Jesaulenko and Bevan.

Cheers —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Busterjp (talk • contribs).

ArticleHistory template
Just a note, Project assessments (B-class) aren't part of the articlehistory template, and trigger an error.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 21:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Archive Box Vista
A you created, Template:Archive Box Vista,  been marked for deletion as  deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the  tag from the template. If you feel the deletion appropriate, no further action is necessary. Cheers. --MZMcBride 22:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

How have you been?
Hello there Sebi. How have you been mate? Haven't spoken to you lately and I don't really go on WLM anymore, but I'm also busy in real life so I am not really editing much now. I hope I can get back to my old editing rate before I go on my 4 week camp leaving August 27. I'm looking forward to that. Let me know how you're going and what has been happening. Kind regards, &mdash; E  talkbots 07:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 

has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Sig
I've replied to the lot of you at my talk page!! :) Pedro | Chat  08:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)