User talk:Sebastian Khaled

Thanks for contributing to the article Robert Fisk. However, do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse.

Please note: contentious material in a biography needs to be sourced to multiple, high quality sources. Although the article subject is deceased he is still covered by BLP rules. A single opinion piece by a non-notable individual published in a little-known source doesn't satisfy that criteria. --DSQ (talk) 11:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Fisk. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --DSQ (talk) 08:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.