User talk:Sebturner

Foreland basin
Hello - thanks for your nice work on the article. One observation - shouldn't the Ural foreland basin be under "Ancient" rather than "Modern" foreland basins? Cheers Geologyguy (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Just thought I'd second the compliment - an excellent article - thank you! Smith609  Talk  16:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, and by the way, I noticed that the image Image:Euroforeland.jpg, and possibly others you've uploaded, lacks a copyright tag. This means they are likely to be deleted soon, which would be a great shame.  To avoid this, you need to place a copyright statement on the image pages stating that you permit use, and modification, of the image by anybody.  I tend to use the following:


 * Cheers, and keep up the good work! Smith609  Talk  16:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Cheers, and keep up the good work! Smith609  Talk  16:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Bachuearthquake1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bachuearthquake1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Samos boudinage image
Hi Seb,

Just a note to tell you that there's been a discussion about your image from Samos on the boudinage talk page. Specifically it's been suggested that the "marble bed" is actually a quartz or quartz-felspar segregation vein. I would certainly expect to be able to detect cleavage in any calcite in the vein as the image quality is so good, but it certainly looks like quartz to me (maybe with some feldspar). Obviously nothing is better than seeing the thing in the field so it would be good to hear what you think.

BTW I did my PhD at Imperial a few years back (actually decades ago between 1978 & 1982), I hope that they've redecorated since then. I expect that you're pretty damn busy with your research at the moment but, if you get the chance, Wikipedia could certainly benefit from your input, editors who are structural geologists are in short supply. Mikenorton (talk) 08:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)