User talk:SecInnovation

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Why delete?
Did you actually read the deletion log entry? Did you see the words "article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject"? That is necessary and sufficient information as to why Security Innovation was deleted. Despite being around for more than a year, no-one had added any independent references to the article.

I am delighted to hear that you do not intend to edit Wikipedia - we do detest people with a COI. Did you read the block log entry: "so if he wants to create an account with a sensible name, he may do so"? I suggest: follow my advice and create an account with a sensible name. The Security Innovation article was created by who seems to be still around to a very limited extent. Contact DatabACE and see if they are willing to try again. Another approach is to find a "sponsor". &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)