User talk:SecretlyRAG

November 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Secretly Canadian has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Secretly Canadian was changed by SecretlyRAG (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88132 on 2019-11-07T20:46:32+00:00

Hello, I'm TheAwesomeHwyh. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Secretly Canadian, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheAwesome Hwyh  22:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TheAwesomeHwyh. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Secretly Canadian seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheAwesome Hwyh  22:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hey thanks so much for the feedback! New to this so trying to figure out what the best wording is. Definitely will work on not using my opinions, but keeping edits neutral. Appreciate your feedback! --SecretlyRAG (talk) 19:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Edits with a conflict of interest
Hello, SecretlyRAG. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Got it! Appreciate the insight. --SecretlyRAG (talk) 19:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

no wp:self published source
Per the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore. It is a wp:self published source. Since this is a long running dispute, any contributor warned by the situation and who doesn't respect it, would encounter sanctions and could be blocked from editing. Thanks. You've been informed because you used this source here and here. Woovee (talk) 01:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)