User talk:Secthayrabe/Archive 1

History of slavery
Why you get bored that much soon? We need experts like you in wikipedia for Iranian related articles. Sorry, it is long weekend here and I am out of town so I can't answer your mails swiftly. I would be happy to work with you on history of slavery. We can make an independent article on Iran. However, there is another urgent issue that has more priority. Mazandarani related articles are messed up by one user and he has pushed his original research and POVs there. I am fixing these articles and clean them up. Could you please help me on them? You may know that Mazandaran is the origin place of Bahaullah. It is not good that they are in such a bad shape. Here is the list of some of them. They are full of craps. History of Tabaristan, Hyrcania, Mazandarani Language, Mazandarani people, Tapurian calendar, Gilaki peoples, Mazandaran Province, Mazandarani cuisine and Nur (where Baha is originated), Sari, ... --Larno (talk) 20:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

It is not my policy to talk about my personal issues on WP. Every body can help WP to improve regardless of his religion and race--Larno (talk) 19:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Baha'u'llah's picture
I thought you might want to be aware that exhaustive debates (here)have transpired about whether or not the picture should be on his page. The consensus among editors here is that it will remain and be restored whenever people try to remove it for the various reasons people feel they should. I'm not intending on having that discussion here at this time, but thought I might save you some trouble and aggravation and point out that the debate has covered all the myriad of points already, and a consensus has been reached. I don't believe it's a subject still open for debate, and you might be well advised to not waste any more time worrying about it. DisarrayGeneral 00:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Sign your comments on talk pages
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:15, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

thanks for making persian war elephants its great

Baha'u'llah's picture
As a fellow Baha'i, I hope you will not be hurt when I say that I am rather disturbed by your immaturity on this question.

Just for the record, of course we don't want the Blessed Likeness displayed in this manner. I'm sure it was first put there by a non-Baha'i - possibly in all innocence. But this is not a Baha'i site, and whether it stays there or not is really is not up to us. Unless you somehow know better than the UHJ! Read what they have to say on the subject. Nor is it up to us to attempt to dictate to non-Baha'is (in any way shape or form) what they should believe.

The picture is currently at the end of the article, with what amounts to a warning to Baha'is. With the picture is a clear statement about how we feel about it. Please understand that, although this is not how we would have chosen to do it - it is none the less a reasonable compromise, which Baha'i editors on this site have fought hard for, and which is still occasionally attacked. The alternative (and the ONLY alternative) would be for it to appear at the head of the article, in the standard way for a biographical article. I suspect you would agree that would be much worse than the current situation. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 10:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

3RR Warning
Just a warning, your next revert on Baha'u'llah crosses WP:3RR, and you will likely get blocked if you do. DisarrayGeneral 17:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Hi. I would recommend that you ask User:Jeff3000 this question. He would most certainly know the answer, as he is a prolific editor on Bahá'í-related articles. Khoikhoi 00:21, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello Secthayrabe, as Baha'is of course we hold the image of Baha'u'llah in the utmost reverence, and thus we would not like the image of Baha'u'llah to be posted. However, the guidance on the reverence for the picture is for Baha'is, and does not apply to people who are not Baha'is. Note that Wikipedia is not a Baha'i website.  The office of Information at the World Centre has noted that "as the creator of the site is not a Bahá'í, there is little, if anything, that can be done to address this matter."  Wikipedia has no censorship policy, which is interpreted to mean that if the picture of Baha'u'llah is not included, it is tantamount to censorship, which is against policy.  Thus as Wikipedia editors we have to abide by Wikipedia policy as it is not a Baha'i website.  The picture is already at the bottom of the page as a manner of courtesy, and any disruption in the page would cause the image to go to the top of the page.


 * You can always disable the image of Baha'u'llah for yourself by following these instructions. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocking the image in Firefox
1. Go to the directory that stores your Mozilla Firefox profile. On Windows XP, it looks something like

C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\ .default\chrome\
 * where
 *  is the name when you log into Windows XP
 * is a 8-digit alphanumberic string which is random, and which Firefox uses to protect your data from hackers

2. In that directory open a file called "userContent.css" (or start a new one with that name if it does not exist).

3. In that file at the top enter this code

img[src*="Bahaullah_from_miller"] { display: none !important; } 4. Restart firefox

That should block the image for you, and you alone Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Slavery in Iran
Sorry, I am busy these days with the real life and I cannot reply swiftly. As you noticed I am very busy with Mazandaran related articles and use my limited time for Wikipedia is spent on those articles. I will get get back to slavery in Iran when I finished with Mazandaran related articles. Meanwile you can go ahead and creat the article--Larno (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Signing
You should also sign your talk page comments with the following characters  ~ . Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Persian War Elephants
I wasn't looking to delete the page, as it has a lot of good content. It does however need re-working. For example, the introduction should be an overview of when the elephants were used, their varyiong importance, or whatever. I was only looking to re-word and/or re-organise certain parts of the article. If you want, I'll send you what I come up with before I edit the page itself. Canislupisbarca (talk) 08:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Persian Cataphract
I have nominated Persian Cataphract, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Persian Cataphract. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 19:26, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Bahá'u'lláh
Per your removal of information on this image, please note that Wikipedia is not censored.--Ave Caesar (talk) 13:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Persian War Elephants
I'm going re-write everything you have written that does not fit wiki's guidelines on tone of language; the content (i.e. the actual information) will remain unchanged however. I've not researched this topic to the length that you have, so I'm not going to remove or add any points of my own. Canislupisbarca (talk) 13:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

==

Will do. Won't be for a while yet though. Canislupisbarca (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Busy
Sorry, I am too too busy with Cyrus and Mazandaran related articles and can't help you on slavery for coming two months--Larno (talk) 15:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Craig james norris
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Craig james norris, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Craig james norris seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Craig james norris, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Craig James Norris
A tag has been placed on Craig James Norris, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Craig James Norris
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Abhishek Talkundefined 15:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

craig james norris
Hi,

I understand that you had just started writing that article but unless the article meets a certain criteria, it gets speedily deleted. If you want a place to write the article then make a Sandbox in your own userspace, no one will delete it. Once you think the article is about ready, you may bring it to the wikipedia namespace. You can make your oen Sandbox by going to User:Secthayrabe/Sandbox. Go to this link and start writing.-Abhishek Talkundefined 15:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Craig J Norris
A tag has been placed on Craig J Norris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Acroterion  (talk)  15:45, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Richard a jones
A tag has been placed on Richard a jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Menti  sock  14:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Map at Writing system
Hi Secthayrabe!

I undid your deletion of the map at Writing system, not because I think you are wrong when you wrote in your edit summary that the map is incorrect, but because I think the map is perhaps 99% correct.

There is currently a dicussion of inaccuracies in this map at talk:Writing system; I think you should bring up your concerns there.

Of course, if there are major errors in the map, it should be removed until they have been resolved - but your edit summary did not make it clear if you think that is the case.

If you delete the map again (feel free to do so!), please state at the talk page or in your edit summary what errors you've found.

You do not need to reply here or at my talk page; I'm watching talk:Writing system.

Yours, Noe --Noe (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

.png]]

Good afternoon/morning/evening/night.
Hello Secthayrabe. This is Jastcaan. My Bucaneer knifearticle has not been deleted (yet) which is lucky otherwise that would have been my fourth deleted artice. Bye Jastcaan (talk) 12:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Jastcaan reply
Thank you for the message. Oh & it's Kha'ak not Kh'aak.Jastcaan (talk) 09:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

What people in the lab say they are in the workplace.
You know, in your place we work, some of your staff (including me) compared themselves to mythical creatures.

The secretary, Craig said he's a werewolf. One of the cleaners is a Bendith y Mamau. Someone called me a fairy. Jastcaan (talk) 10:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Spelling
My username is Jastcaan, not Jarscaan.Jastcaan (talk) 09:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Jastcaan Message
In case you didn't know, the top link & the Persian Cataphract link are red. I think you better sort this out.Jastcaan (talk) 12:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Byzantines
Well, I never said the Eastern Romans were exclusively Greeks. However it is a well established fact that the East Roman Empire was dominated by the Greek culture and the Greek-speaking part of its population, which had played a dominant role in the region already since Hellenistic times. Especially after it lost the Middle East to the Muslims, the BE became even more Greek in character. The BE is part of Greek history, which stretches far more back than modern Greece. The fact that the bulk of its territory lies in modern-day Turkey is completely irrelevant. The very article on the BE says "Due to the linguistic, cultural, and demographic dominance of medieval Greek,[4] it was known to many of its western European contemporaries as Imperium Graecorum, the Empire of the Greeks". Granted, the BE is not only part of Greek history, but also of Armenian, Syrian, Persian, Serbian, Bulgarian and many other histories. But, historically, the people associated with the BE par excellence have been the Greeks. If you think that a battle fought in Egypt or Palestine is a stretch to include within Greek history, let me inform you that at the time, there was a significant Greek population in Egypt and Palestine, and the Persian conquest was a catalyst in their relations with the local Semitic population, and paved the way for the Arab conquest, which ended the Hellenistic legacy in the region. P.S. please add your comments at the end of a talk page, and sign them. Thanks, Constantine  ✍  20:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I am sorry but what you say flouts both scholarly opinion and common sense. A Greek-speaking Empire, whose ruling class was either Greek or Hellenized, and centered in areas were Greek-speakers formed the majority, clearly belongs to Greek history, regardless of where the bulk of its territories stands today, 500 years after its fall. The BE is certainly part of Turkish history also, just as it is of Bulgaria and many other nations that interacted with it. However, prior to the 11th century, the Turks appear only on the fringes of Byz. history. There are plenty scholars who use the term "Greek" to refer to the Byzantines, and it is not a coincidence that in many universities, there are chairs on "Byzantine and Modern Greek studies". Do a search on books on the subject, whatever questions you have will be easily answered. Cheers, Constantine  ✍  18:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * That's a bit cheeky coming from a person who has not properly researched a single thing in the articles he's contributed on Byzantine history... I've been reading on Byzantine history for over ten years now, and know what the Byzantines were and what not. If you think that "Roman" is some sort of ethnonym that is incompatible with Greek identity and culture, then evidently you know nothing about Byzantine society and culture. And if you want to contradict historians like J.B. Bury, G. Ostrogorsky, Cyril Mango, Warren Treadgold and countless others when they use the term "Greek(s)" or "Byzantine Greek(s)" alongside "Roman(s)" to describe the Empire and the majority of its inhabitants, then you're free to express your own thoughts on the subject, provided they're backed up by proper sources. Until you do that, I'll stop trying to convince you... It is you who need to do your homework, I'm afraid. Cheers, and take care. Constantine  ✍  12:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply
If i feel like blanking my talk page & not creating an archive, I will.Jastcaan (talk) 10:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi!
Nice to meet you, I see that you have a very interesting user page, and I was wondering if you (as a proffessor) can help me with the issue which I last signed my name on the talk page of the Battle of Opis, recently ChrisO and his others have been creating disputes over disputed translations and not really staying on their own words, so I was just wonder if you agree with me, if you go to its talk page read the section titled "A new set of translations 2". Please reply on my talk page, and let me know if you can handle this dispute I'm having. Currently I am outnumbered 5:1 but I am trying to be nice in presenting much of my evidence, they either have an agenda against Persian culture and Cyrus the Great, or can not use common sense. So please tell me if your for or against of what I say on that talk page. Thank you very very much.--Ariobarza (talk) 11:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk


 * The dispute is this;


 * ChrisO thinks that Cyrus invaded Babylon in September-October 539 BC, wheras normal history and evidence says that he began his march in winter 540 BC, and resumed his march in February 539 BC, after he was delayed at the Tigris river for a couple of months.


 * And he denies even if he was delayed at the Tigris, that Cyrus ever fought a battle at the Tigris while cuneiform evidence suggests it, with a few lines missing, 4/6 translations by the good historians on the subject welcome the idea, three of which totally say that he did fight a battle in February 539 BC at the Tigris river. Even some of Herodotus' Histories, and Xenophons' Cyropaedia writings say that there was an earlier battle than the last battle and the capture of Babylon in October, when Cyrus conquering Babylonia, and being called king in February 538 BC.

ChrisO (and others that he recruited) denies all the evidence, he says I do wishfull thinking and it is original research, when in fact, most of the sources available actually agree with me (with the main guy who is [A.T. Olmstead] a renown historian of Persia, which wrote and his students updated after his death the famous book, which is titled, History of the Persian Empire), but that is not the point. He lacks a common sense approach to things, and is very strict, I have trouble editing on Wikipedia, because I know ChrisO is going to come out of the dark and blow things of little value, totally out of poportion. When you go on the Opis page, go to its archives in talk, and look at how a translation dispute which I had no real stance on, almost got a lot of people in trouble, I was called a nationalist, and threatened. But good thing the dispute was sorta settling and things are a little back to normal.

So their you go, sorry if I flooded you with this problem, but you can find the best evidence for my case in the talk page of Battle of Opis, in the section titled "A new set of translations 2" (as I have already said above), read that message from top to bottom, it is the best. And finally I thank you dearly for reading this message, with best regards, goodbye now.--Ariobarza (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk

Yes
Please see Barnstars. Khoikhoi 00:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Don ot say school! Say workplace!Jastcaan (talk) 10:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Secth
Hi, thanks for replying on the talk page of Battle of Opis, but you shouldnt put what message that I put for you, it was just something to sum it all up. And ChrisO is going to think that he offended you, wheras it was me, I am going to change the message, because it sounds like a complianing message, BUT thanks again, just don't put messages that I put for you, on that talk page. Many thanks though.--Ariobarza (talk) 16:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk

Reply
There is a user called bobo but bobo would have signed it with 4 tildes. Did you send the vandalism message because you told me you would send it yesterday & you never sign it properly with 4 tildes so it must have been you.Jastcaan (talk) 10:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Another reply
Yes I thought so.†.Jastcaan (talk) 10:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Symbols
It seems you have decided to send me crosses. How about this? ₩ ¥  ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦  ₩ ¥   ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦Æ. --Jastcaan (talk) 09:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Werewolf
The werewolf is fine though he also wants to be a werepenguin. & you mean two not to when doing numbers.Jastcaan (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Mylasa
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Battle of Mylasa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Note: I did not actually tag the article for deletion, I am just notifying you after converting a request for speedy deletion by 80.135.123.146 (talk · contribs) on this page to a WP:PROD. Camaron | Chris (talk) 16:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Byzantines means Greeks
The Byzantines were Greeks. they also had other people like Armenians but mainly Greek. and Turks came from Asia and attacked the Byzantine Empire. read a book, Iranian.150.140.227.137 (talk) 14:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * i'm not plakidas. don't accuse people so easily.150.140.227.137 (talk) 20:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Please calm down
Just because some IP posted an offensive message to you, doesn't mean that it was me. So far, I've always contacted you in a straightforward manner, as a registered user, just as I conduct all my interaction with Wikipedia and its users, and I certainly don't intend to begin hiding behind anonymous edits now. Indeed, I find the fact that you linked this incident to me most curious. There are plenty of idiots on the web, as you should well know (this incident just proves it), but I certainly am not in the habit of posting offensive messages just like that. Constantine  ✍  18:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Eh? What exactly do you mean? If you refer to the fact that you did indeed as an IP user post messages, vandalize my homepage, etc., you've practically admitted it was you already... As for the message I left when you said you would leave, I did this to clarify my legitimate objections to the assessing of the Persian war elephants article as a GA or B class, and in order to encourage a potentially valuable contributor to WP (namely YOU) not to leave, but stay around and learn how to do things around here. I have far better things to do than engage in a childish tit-for-tat exchange of insults, and anonymously at that. So far I think I have been courteous and honest to you, even though we have had different views on certain things, and I don't intend to change that any time soon. Constantine  ✍  18:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Final comments
... in order to put this sad story behind us... Firstly, you say I was the "only suspect". I'' reiterate that I don't think that my previous behaviour has indicated any tendency to insult you. At every point I've disagreed with you, I've done so openly and with arguments. Anyway... Secondly, I do not have a problem with you, personally. I quite like Iranians and have great respect for their history. What I don't like is groundless POV-pushing and including (deliberately or not) false information in articles. That's why I advised you to do proper research and include the sources you checked up in your articles, and I would do the same whether you were a Greek or a Neptunian... If I have appeared harsh, sorry, but I only meant it as advice by someone who has a bit more experience here... Cheers, and goodbye for now. Constantine  ✍  20:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Your move of Zoroastrian eschatology
Your move of the Zoroastrian eschatology to a Baha'i named page is definitely vandalism, and is also completely not neutral. Zoroastrian belief in their eschatology is quite different that how Baha'is interpret it, and renaming the page and removing of the content of the page is insulting to Zoroastrians, as well to as to any academic. Please refrain from pushing your POV on an encyclopedia. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 22:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Reply
He says he's a werewolf or werepenguin. & there is no need for a space between were & cheese.

You've done some vandalism too apparently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jastcaan (talk • contribs) 11:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Battle of Mylasa
An article that you have been involved in editing, Battle of Mylasa, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Battle of Mylasa. Thank you. JuJube (talk) 09:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar
I've got the Barnstar on my user page now.

Battle of Mylasa is going to be deleted apparently. Jastcaan (talk) 13:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome
You're welcome. I'm glad you liked the changes. I don't know much about the subject, but an expert has said he would look at the article this weekend. So hopefully that will bring more insight to the article. It's a bit complicated because the topic includes various ancient empires, the Persian people, Persia, and then Iran (which is a nation that has not existed for very long as it is presently defined). So for example Timur seems to hve been very brutal, as you state, and yet adopted some Persian customs. So did slavery under his reign mean there was slavery in Iran? Or was this an example of the enslavement of Iran? I don't know. Cheers. Thank you for your comment. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Request to restore Mihran article
I've restored the article. - Rjd0060 (talk) 20:21, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Zend−hapet
I have nominated Zend−hapet, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Zend−hapet. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. dougweller (talk) 08:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Redirect
Someone has redirectd Bzantine Cataphracts to Cataphracts. & you sent me something but didn't sign it. I know it was you because: 86.3.88.158. Jastcaan (talk) 13:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Shahshah you
Hello secthayrabe by the way I am not you but you do deserve this....

AfD nomination of History of slavery in Iran
An article that you have been involved in editing, History of slavery in Iran, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/History of slavery in Iran. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Who is Jasty? I mean you put it on my talk page.Jastcaan (talk) 10:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for Bran Star friend. I did not spend much in Wikipedia during last two months. See you around dude!--Larno (talk) 03:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

History of Slavery in Iran article
Would you care to weigh in on the discussion on the History of slavery in Iran article's talk page? Another editor has taken exception to that article including Iran in the Ottoman Empire and to a discussion of sexual slavery. If you know some other people with expertise in this area I'd like to get some more opinions on the matter. Thanks. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Cipher
I have been reading some books & found out some new codes & ciphers. There is one which replaces every vowel with the following letter in the alphabet, all visible vowels are spces & avisible spaces are random & only mislead. For example " I am a professer" becomes " Jb ma be prp fffss fr ". Jastcaan (talk) 13:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)