User talk:Sedicesimo

Replacing a file.
Hi Sedicesimo, welcome to Wikipedia. Next time, you can replace a file by going to the existing file, scroll down, and click "Upload a new version of this file". This avoids an administrator having to tag the older file for deletion and another administrator deleting it. It also keeps the same file name so the article does not have to be changed. As well, I have edited the text of the file you uploaded to use the proper book cover license, which was one of the choices of the File Upload Wizard. Prhartcom (talk) 22:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * George Worsley Adamson
 * added links pointing to George Barker, Richard Carpenter, John Wells and Norman Hunter

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Patriciabeer1982.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Patriciabeer1982.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PatriciaBeer.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PatriciaBeer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Dearbilltn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dearbilltn.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Davidrrussell2009tn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Davidrrussell2009tn.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Noblehouseholdstn.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Noblehouseholdstn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Mathieson & Sons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Biggar and Gallowgate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French Hospital (La Providence), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Builder. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Watkin (historian), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Adamson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Royalgoldsmithstn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Royalgoldsmithstn.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Royalgoldsmithstn.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Royalgoldsmithstn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Royalgoldsmithstn.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Royalgoldsmithstn.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

I've opened a discussion at Files for Deletiom so that other editors can weigh in with their opinions as there has been no resolution from our discussion on the file's talk page. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 20:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Timrawletn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Timrawletn.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for drawing my attention to this fair-use image. I have asked the copyright holder to agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free licence: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. Please let me know what needs to be done to move the image from Wikipedia to Wikimedia Commons with permission pending. Regards Sedicesimo (talk) 20:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * See []. -- Whpq (talk) 21:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have just learnt that the photographer has agreed to publish her photograph under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International licence and that she has sent her confirmation to Wikimedia Commons and received confirmation of receipt. May I leave it to you and your colleagues to restore the image as soon as you can on the Tim Rawle page. With many thanks. Sedicesimo (talk) 13:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Glad to see that the picture has been released. I have now restored it to the Tim Rawle page. Many thanks. Sedicesimo (talk) 14:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Cambridgetn.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Cambridgetn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adamson (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Adamson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Randolph Vigne
I changed the url in the cite book template because Template:Cite_book specifically says "Do not link to any commercial booksellers, such as Amazon.com". WP:PAGELINK does allow for links to Google Books Wayne Jayes (talk) 21:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Storr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Los Angeles County Museum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cambridge (book)


The article Cambridge (book) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No significant independent coverage of this book - fails WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 08:49, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
Thank you for your recent articles, including Gilbert Lesage, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including Gilbert Lesage, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Oxbridgeportfoliologo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Oxbridgeportfoliologo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oxbridgeportfoliologo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Oxbridgeportfoliologo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:ThomasJeckyll.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:ThomasJeckyll.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve A Classical Adventure: The Architectural History of Downing College, Cambridge
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Sedicesimo, thanks for creating A Classical Adventure: The Architectural History of Downing College, Cambridge!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be far batter if this book were used as a supporting reference to further the content of the Downing College page, and not as an advertising tool, supported by the inevitable extracts of book reviews. extracts.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Sedicesimo

Thank you for creating Noble Households.

User:TheLongTone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 15:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello TheLongTone Many thanks! Cornforth was a prolific writer. I think it would be worthwhile listing more of his works, something to look at when I have a (long) moment. Sedicesimo (talk) 09:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Adding books
Hi, I see you are adding books by Cornforth et. al. to a number of architecture articles. It is actually rather confusing if you add them to the References/Sources sections, when they are not, in fact, cited in the articles. Would it be better to add them to a Further reading section? An example could be Sissinghurst Castle Garden. Alternatively, you could, of course, include something from the books in the articles. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 13:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hillsborough Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Country Life. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Great Irish Households moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Great Irish Households, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I've moved this article into the draftspace, because there is nothing to indicate that the book in question is notable. You cite only two sources, one of which is the publisher's website, whereas notability per WP:GNG requires multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. Meanwhile, a book that was published only earlier this week is highly unlikely to meet the WP:NBOOK guideline for special notability either, and there certainly is nothing in the article to suggest this. I also note that each of the two sources has been cited only once, leaving the vast majority of the article content unsupported. Please add more and better sources and citations, and when you feel the draft is ready, you can submit it for pre-publication review by clicking that blue 'submit' button. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GreatIrishHouseholdstn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GreatIrishHouseholdstn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 16:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Irish Households has been accepted
 Great Irish Households, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Great_Irish_Households help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Curbon7 (talk) 18:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great Irish Households, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Cobb.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)