User talk:Sedo161

Speedy deletion of Sedo: Secondary Domain Name Marketplace
A tag has been placed on Sedo: Secondary Domain Name Marketplace, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑ X - Man  15:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself.  If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a  tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. — Matt Eason (Talk &#149; Contribs) 15:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion.  — Matt Eason (Talk &#149; Contribs) 17:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tombomp (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  — Matt Eason (Talk &#149; Contribs) 22:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Sedo
A tag has been placed on Sedo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Sedo and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ArglebargleIV (talk) 18:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Sedo
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sedo, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sedo.com/about/index.php3?tracked=&amp;partnerid=&amp;language=us. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)