User talk:Seduisant/Archive 5

Re: SoE
— SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 01:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC) Fixed! — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 01:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Commons POO
I am requesting a rename on Commons. My current Commons name is SeduisantRedux. Seduisant (talk) 03:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Project Punk Newsletter: February 2012 (Volume III, Issue I)
Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

16:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

User talk:209.112.248.178
Hi, after a level 4 ("final") warning, you should report vandals to WP:AIV where an admin will block them, rather than just giving them another warning. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  18:26, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. When you recently edited Honeypot (computing), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. When you recently edited It Hurts to Be in Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musicor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Re: My Compliments
Yes, I created WikiProject Death, but User:Jeraphine Gryphon did the most recent layout update. I agree it looks great, though! :) --Geniac (talk) 00:28, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Look of Love
Just FYI: If/when you create an article for the Lesley Gore song, the correct title appears to be "Look of Love" (no "The"). See these many examples. Cheers! -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  18:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion
I have declined your speedy deletion tagging of Freaky boiz. My feeling is that there are just enough references there to pass WP:CSD as a claim of importance. At least some of them appear to be reliable sources, so I think that if it is to be deleted, it needs to be a fuller discussion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please take it to WP:AFD (after doing WP:BEFORE to see if there are other valid references). Qwyrxian (talk) 11:29, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Pardofelis and Catopuma
Okay, these are the sources I've seen, so that we know where we are. MSW3, which was published in 2005, places the bay and Asian golden cats in Catopuma, and is presumably the source used in our articles. The IUCN redlist, whose pages on the subject were last revised in 2008, places all three in Pardofelis. The Handbook of the Mammals of the World, vol. 1, published in 2009, uses the MSW3 categorisation - although I note it has one of the same editors-in-chief.

The IUCN quotes as their source this article in Science magazine (registration required), alongside a then-unpublished paper apparently submitted to the Journal of Mammalogy, but which I have been unable to locate in the journal's archives. Looking at the Science paper, it simply asserts the use of Pardofelis (sensu lato), without specifically justifying it. The cladogram provides plausible grounds for the broader meaning, but does not demand it, since Catopuma would remain monophyletic.

So. Hmm. I'm not seeing much of a scientific consensus there, really. Anaxial (talk) 18:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. When you recently edited Robert Salmon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peabody Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know: Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 21:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
 * Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
 * If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Regarding the edit to SMiLE...
I deleted a single review that was an outlier. It was way off from virtually every other review written about this album. I read it, and the reviewer in question was not able to back up his bad rating with any real thought or analysis. The whole thing was 2 short paragraphs long and said nothing of value except "Pet Sounds is better" and then threw around some very pretentious phrases like "pop economy" to seem hip. It reads like a snob wanting to be the first to say the emperor has no clothes and thus look like an edgy reporter ahead of the crowd. Well, if the reviewer in question was at least able to express his criticism intelligently I would've kept the review up. But as it stands, it is an informally written, highly biased and all-around unhelpful bit of crap. It has no right to be used as an academic source. I removed it, and I'd do it again. The only reason I can think for you to disagree is because you want to have one stock "bad review" to "show balance" in the article, whether it's deserved or not. That, or you yourself are biased against me simply because I edited a page without being a member. Forgive me, but I've met many stuck up Wiki-editors with that mindset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.190.89.140 (talk) 03:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Re:Crossarchus

 * Re:Crossarchus

I know, an old edit, but it was sitting for multiple years - this ref is about "Crossarchus alexandri", not "Crossarchus" Bulwersator (talk) 10:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Thanks for the update on the Ptown article
I've never quite figured the best way to respond directly to a post on my talk page... that is, do I reply on your page, like this, or do I post on my page, so you can see both sides of the conversation...   I chose the latter, so this is just a 'tickler' note pointing back to my response. Thanks!!! Groll †ech ( talk ) 00:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Just wanted to let you know that I have created Long Point (Cape Cod). When you get a moment, I'd love to get your thoughts on it.  Thanks!  Groll †ech  ( talk ) 00:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Inappropriate posting by this user
I am appalled at an inappropriate posting on my talk page from this user. Resorting to an ad hominem reference is unjustifiable. 98.229.11.248 (talk) 18:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Project Punk Newsletter: May 2012 (Volume III, Issue II)
Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

Cheers,

benzband ( talk ) &  Guerillero  &#124;  My Talk  06:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Claims of Vandalism?
What is your problem, buddy? I don't remember "vandalizing" any pages. Don't smack people with false vandalism claims, it's not nice.

Thembonesareme (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Re. Vandal
That's alright, I should have expected something like that - esp. on an article for a person of infamy/controversy - might happen. Hope someone can bring the real joker to wiki-justice. Good-bye.

Thembonesareme (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

7 States
Yes, deep sleep without dreams. Dreaming is different than sleeping. --BwB (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Stuy
The school is still prestigious. This IP editor is not, however. :) -- Y not? 18:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Google Compute Engine
Hello Seduisant. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Google Compute Engine, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. → Σ τ  c. 03:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles on Cats
We happen to have both edited Wildcat recently, and i think you'll want the whole picture these present: (I don't know from ... shall i say Batguano? ... about cats (and don't recall what drew me into my stylistic edits), so i've no perspective on the IP in question.) --Jerzy•t 20:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Discordance between your summary and the edit's effect
 * 2) Net effect of edits since mine
 * 3) The IP's suite of 3 consecutive edits: What you must have intended to revert

That was not vandalism!
In the page 'Big Cat', I noticed that in the 'Evolution' section there was a mistake, because it contradicts the reference where it comes from. If you look at the page of the reference, it says 'About 3.6 to 2.5 million years ago, the jaguar began to evolve, while lions and leopards split from one other about 3.1 to 1.95 million years ago.', whereas in the article it says that firstly lions split from the group, and then jaguars from leopards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laia lion (talk • contribs) 09:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)