User talk:See-3 Pee-Oh

Administrator's Noticeboard Notice
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The thread is Mass Creation of UN Resolution Stubs --Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

I was trying to help Wikipedia, so other editors could add to the new stub pages I created. Unhelpful?See-3 Pee-Oh (talk) 01:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Probably, to be honest I'm not sure that they even meet the minimum for stubs which is part of the reason I brought it up at The Administrator's Noticeboars what kind of raised my eye was the amount of pages created in such a short amount of time. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Is there a minimum for stubs? Do you want me to stop, then? See-3 Pee-Oh (talk) 01:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes there is a minimum for a stub, you probably should stop for now. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * See WikiProject International relations/Assessment --Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * As an editor who just happened to stumble upon this, I would like to state that I think there is no reason to delete these stub articles. Although it would be much better if basic information about the resolutions could be added, such that found at List of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 2101 to 2200, I don't believe there is any reason to mass delete the stubs when they are going to be created sooner or later anyway. It is considered quite rude to immediately bring up an issue with a user on WP:ANI, especially when you admitted that you are not even sure if any policy was broken, and even more so when the user appears to be new and performing their edits in good faith. You should attempt to contact the user directly on their talk page, or use WP:DR, to try to resolve the issue, before going to WP:ANI. WP:ANI should only be a last resort. Thanks. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 05:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Apologies, I didn't realise that you posted it on WP:AN rather than WP:ANI. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 05:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry this seems to have got a bit off-track. We certainly welcome new editors adding new articles. If that didn't happen, there'd be very little here at all, and we could all go home, so thanks for your efforts - they are appreciated.

Is there an easy way to incorporate the addition of basic details which suggests above into your stub creation workflow? It would certainly make the articles much more useful if it can be done. They are useful anyway, but if you need any help improving what you are doing, feel free to ask. If the person you ask is unsure, they can generally point you in the right direction. That's how we work here.

Thanks again for your contributions, and my apologies if this overspill of bureaucracy upset you in any way. It gets impersonal, sometimes, and folks forget that people are new, and not used to it. Please carry on contributing. Begoon &thinsp; talk 11:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * My apologies if you feel as though I threatened, upset, or discouraged you. That wasn't my intention at all by opening an thread at WP:AN I was trying to figure if the articles were indeed in line with policy. It was never my intention to be Bitey --Cameron11598 (Talk) 16:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)