User talk:Seeitbelieveit

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sue Schafer, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. &#9733; Oliverlyc &#9733; ✈✈✈  Pop me a message!  02:42, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Sue Schafer
Hi, I have reviewed your edit on Sue Schafer more thoroughly and have determined it to be constructive. Please pardon me for my mistaken warning. Together, lets make Wikipedia a better place. :)

Once again, my apologies.

&#9733; Oliverlyc &#9733; ✈✈✈  Pop me a message!  03:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Initial Reaction
Hi there,

It was more of my fault. While I was checking the article, I understand Sue Schafer to be some sort of politician. However, your edit 'Schafer wondered, "if there's a risk for more sexual activity, more male irresponsibility"' came out as very suspicious, mainly due to its sexual nature and the word "wondered" which seems quite "un-encyclopedia" like. I failed to review the source and marked it as vandalism. Perhaps you can try avoiding words that seems to tell a story next time. Cheers!

&#9733; Oliverlyc &#9733; ✈✈✈  Pop me a message!  03:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)