User talk:SefBau/Archive 1

Welcome

 * Thank you for welcoming me. I appreciate it, and thanks also for the guidelines! SefBau (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Have a question
Hi, I want to be a contributing editor here, however I have an important question, is there a list of "tags", the one you put on a page like, and etc. Is there a complete list of those different tags that we put on a page. Thanks a lot! SefBau : msg  05:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is such a list. Take a look at WP:TC. Also please see WP:RESPTAG & WP:TAGGING. Regards, -- Glaisher  [talk]  06:13, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, great help! SefBau : msg  12:25, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Nitin goyal
nitin goyal is a businessman and from chandigarh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shankigoyal (talk • contribs) 10:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, what is this about? Can I help you? I don't understand what you're trying to say. Please enlighten me. SefBau : msg  10:23, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Nitin goyal
nitin goyal is a businessman and from chandigarh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shankigoyal (talk • contribs) 10:16, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Duplicated message, please see my reply above. SefBau : msg  10:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greenbank Public School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandbox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia's deletion process
Greetings,, and welcome to Wikipedia's deletion process! Thank you for your contributions. As a newcomer, it may be helpful for you to read Wikipedia's deletion policy, and the pages describing the articles for deletion process, proposed deletion, and speedy deletion. Remember that deletion debates are not votes, and reasons matter, especially reasons relating to the central content policies of verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research, and what Wikipedia is not, and to the consensual community guidelines for biographies, corporations, music, and fiction. Also remember that deletion is not always the answer to a bad article. Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you have any questions. Again, welcome! Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Tango Café
Thank you, SefBau, I greatly appreciate your taking the time to advise and comment on the creation of the Tango Café page. Not sure if this is the correct place to address the concerns. If not, I apologize and please enlighten me.

There were two criticisms: one that the piece "read like a biography" of the owner. Three sentences out of nine mentioned her name. I have eliminated the last two references. (As a newbie with wikipedia, I don't really see the references as excessive, but so be it. )

The other issue was the use of videos as references. There were six articles referenced from newspapers. There were seven references to "The Tango Cafe Legacy" video series, of which five were interviews or discussions. Their purpose was to document the Tango Café's role in Pittsburgh as a cultural center in multiple dimensions. To me, again as a new contributor, these seem more "verifiable" than many printed and broadcast sources. They don't qualify as "self-published", in the sense that the author/videographer of the series, Victor Beltrán, was not a subject or a participant. (I did fail to include the author's name.) In any case, they may be republished the Latin American Cultural Union or the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce; I don't know if that makes them more suitable as references or not.

The remaining references document music performances and art shows at the Café; I can see the problem with including them in the reference section. I wonder whether some of these are suitable for inclusion via an "External Links" section or side-bar?

I greatly appreciate the chance to contribute to wikipedia; with time I will master the authoring skills. Thank you! Notsofeo (talk) 23:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi! I myself is new here in WP, you've also reached the right place for me to answer. I'm actually confused with your article first, what is your main reason for contributing that article? Please read WP:Notability & WP:GNG & WP:NOT. Right, the article somehow have references, but as the article looks right now it is not on a publishing state. It is actually confusing as a cafe was also used as a cultural center, as I see this is what you're trying to say its significance. However, "video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a 'reputable' party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources. Like text sources, media sources must be produced by a reliable third party and be properly cited.' For me, YouTube is not. References about the performances must be few, personally the inline citation for the performances looks too cluttered.
 * Maybe you have the right references but the way it is written doesn't give me the impression of its importance. Read existing articles that is similar to yours and base your WP:Formatting there, as improper formats often doesn't get approved. Expand the whole article to give us vast information for its significance to have its own page here. BTW, you can still add credible information about the owner if it is needed I said it looks like a bio since there was little info for the main article and just looks like a bio. :)
 * I may be wrong so let the other editors read it, RESUBMIT IT but I'm guessing they'll say the same. Sorry couldn't help much as I'm only using my mobile phone. Hope this helps. SefBau : msg  01:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

CSD pointers
Hi Sef! I just deleted an article you tagged for CSD, and wanted to give you a quick tip on tagging for deletion. The article in question (Davy vara) was a pretty clear A7 (didn't assert notability about the subject), but you also tagged it as a G10 (attack page). I read it over and it didn't seem like an attack to me. Usually, we only tag things as attack pages when they're pretty blatant. Good call on the A7, though. Keep up the good work, and feel free to ask me anytime if you have questions. Best, Keilana&#124;Parlez ici 08:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the fast action. I tagged it as an attack since for me the article somehow stated potential libelous information without sources. Sorry about that, next time I'll be careful. SefBau : msg  08:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It's totally okay, and sometimes a G10 is a matter of interpretation. It was getting deleted either way. I look forward to seeing you around! :) Keilana&#124;Parlez ici 08:51, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I hope so too - busy with some things. I'll just familiarize myself first. :) Take care. SefBau : msg  11:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Joe Lipa
Ok, no problem, i'll try to find a way to add my source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edmon74 (talk • contribs)
 * Thanks for complying. :) SefBau : msg  11:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm guessing you are newish around here
Thanks for pointing out the similar editing patterns. I've opened a sockpuppetry report for those with the toolset to check them out. It;s pretty easy to do, but it helps if you have a tool like Twinkle. Doing it manually is a pain in the fundament Fiddle   Faddle  15:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the head's up. I've supported your report and added my explanation. Yes, I'm new around here. I'm using Twinkle aswell, I'm just not sure if it's true sockpuppetry, but since you did it thanks! :) Have a great day! SefBau : msg  16:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Same concept, different note, but I thought I wouldn't include it under the same heading. It's great that you've jumped straight into some of the more complicated stuff but please do be careful when deciding whether something should be nominated for deletion. WP:BEFORE (as in "before you nominate something for deletion") is an important step in the process. It encourages you to check for sources that might not be present in the article but might be available. Improving an article with sources is always a better option than deleting - remember we are here to build an encyclopaedia. This nomination, for example, probably wasn't a very good idea. Just remember that the notability of subjects isn't judged on the sources currently listed in articles, but on the availability of sources that cover the subject. Don't just nominate articles for deletion because they contain no sources - nominate them if, after doing your own search, you can't find any sources that could be added. Yeah? Happy hunting! Stalwart 111  11:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello, thanks for the suggestions and I will definitely follow it. Pardon me for my ignorance. That's why at first I tagged it for BLPPROD, my mistake was I didn't do my own research for the references. Maybe I was lazy at that time since I'm using my mobile phone when I nominated that article. Thanks again!! SefBau : msg  12:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem at all. From what I can tell, 90% of what you've done (maybe more) is good quality stuff. Not a bad strike rate at all for a newbie! Keep it up!
 * But you're gonna hate me - I'm starting to think Ingrid Lukas might also be notable enough for inclusion. Sorry. She was part of the official Swiss Government-appointed talent roster for the London 2012 Olympics; part of the House of Switzerland. It's not the strongest claim for notability but it might just get her over the line. Anyway, I'll post a comment at the AFD and we'll see what everyone else thinks. Cheers! Stalwart 111  12:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, saw your edits, well done! You're practically re-made the article in a way fits WP standards. I'll be cautious on my actions next time. :) SefBau : msg  12:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep, I don't like suggesting something should be kept at AFD without at least trying to clean it up a bit, especially where the :need for a clean-up has been raised during the discussion. Anyway, have commented at the AFD with regard to the cultural exchange stuff. Cheers, Stalwart 111  13:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was notified. Lets just wait for additional consensus. have a great day! :) SefBau : msg  13:47, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you too! Stalwart 111  14:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Gabriella Romano article.
I feel you had no authority to remove an article with a reference towards Disney Channel. This article had been written with extremely close judgement towards the truth and lies of what could have possibly been said, I'd rather my article is not removed next time I re-write it, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurynjreid (talk • contribs) 13:09, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Good day! I reverted your edit as I assume good faith. I have every right to remove unsourced information that you added. You tagged Disney, but where is the link to your claim? That is another unsourced claim that can't be proven. Thanks for your contribution but to have unsourced info about a biography in WP is not needed, however you are welcome to add independent sources. :) SefBau : msg  13:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=568935623 your edit] to HISTORY (South Korean Boy Group) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Facebook page, "HISTORY 1st Mini Album [JUST NOW] teaser image. HISTORY's coming up August 20!!: " and teaser images of the group was released. On the 15th of August, HISTORY released a video

On "EDGARDO BUSCAGLIA"
I am SofiaRey. You provided very valuable comments in my file titled "Edgardo Buscaglia" Thank you very much for your kind comments and guidance. I am a bit lost. Could you please access my text and Please make the changes you may see fit to modify the " structure" of my file "Edgardo Buscaglia" in the way you so kindly suggest? Your inputs would be so welcome and appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.147.123.166 (talk) 14:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, User:SofiaRey, I edited your article. If you notice, I added "Personal life and Education sections" and did some clean-ups. Just move and add the respective information in it ofcourse with proper citations. Also,  you can add an info box (dont know? search for it for now, I'm only using my mobile phone)  SefBau :  msg  15:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I've added the infobox, just fill up the correct information. :) SefBau : msg  15:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

AJ Perez (blogger)
Hi Sir! I thank you for being kind to me in my first post here in Wikipedia. I really appreciate those edits that you are doing and I hope that I can grow more here in Wikipedia with you watching my back. :)

However, one of the editors, DGG, tagged our wiki article for deletion, which I believe should not be the case because the subject (Perez) is notable, which you did agree to before.

I made my appeal on the deletion page, and I hope you can share your inputs there as well. I just don't want to see both of our hardwork go to waste. Here's the link: []

Many thanks sir! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerdork (talk • contribs) 22:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Good day! DGG is not just an editor but also an administrator, but since he's not sure if it needs to be deleted he asked for a WP:Consensus, then another administrator will evaluate. I've added my comment but as you've already said it all, I just supported your claim. We are here to build Wikipedia anyways. SefBau : msg  03:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Asma Chandani
With reference to the aforementioned page, citations have been added upon prompt, and indication of notability included. Additional material can be added to supplement. Please advise. Thanks. Jb810813 (talk) 23:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Jb810813
 * Hi, unfortunately your article has already been deleted by an administrator:


 * 19:05, 20 August 2013 User:Basalisk deleted page Asma Chandani Reason: (A7: Article about an eligible subject, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)
 * If you want to appeal, you can request for undeletion, or contact the deleting administrator first. OR you may still recreate the article again BY FOLLOWING the articles for creation process, wherein every submission will be reviewed, you call also inform me again once you submitted your article for review and I'll put my inputs again. Also, if you want to retrieve the deleted information, contact the deleting administrator.
 * If you have any questions again, please ask me again. Have a good day! SefBau : msg  05:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

On EDGARDO BUSCAGLIA
I am very thankful fr your kind and valuable advice on this EDGARDO BUSCAGLIA piece. I would not have known where to go without your suggested structure. tnank you. I will add the information you suggested.

The education, pro bono work and international awards named after Edgardo Buscaglia can be added without any problems. On his "personal life", I do not possess any information and the public websites on "Edgardo Buscaglia" with many of his op-eds and articles for the general media such as in The New York Times or in scientific journals, do not state details on "personal" life most likely on privacy and safety grounds (given his line of worldwide work on counter-organized crime and saving victims' lives) . Would it then be OK not to include a section on "personal life"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SofiaRey (talk • contribs) 07:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Good day, ofcourse those were just my suggestion and a section about his personal life is not needed. I'll keep watching your article. :) SefBau : msg  11:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

An article you accepted has been tagged for deletion
The article Pagemodo, which you recently accepted as an Articles for Creation submission, has been tagged for deletion. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Retrospectively contested PROD
Back in August, you supported a proposed deletion of Michelle Hurst. The article was deleted, but I have now restored it in response to a request at Requests for undeletion. I am letting you know, so that you may consider taking the article to WP:Articles for deletion if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)