User talk:Segmentluxe

Wikipedia's paid editing policy
Hello Segmentluxe. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Sofitel. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Segmentluxe. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

I am also obliged to tell you that your edits are under discussion at the conflict of interest noticeboard; the thread is Sofitel, again. - Bri (talk) 14:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Repeating the above: "If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message." Please don't make this escalate. Bri (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)