User talk:Segovia was

Huh?
I don't understand the purpose of your comment to my talk page. I've removed it per WP:TALK. If you have something to say to me, please make your point clear and try to follow the appropriate policies and guidelines. --Ronz (talk) 18:44, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you'll find me to be clear; forgiving and just. You don't have to tell me why you removed it. It's fine. Always following policy blindly would be stupid, wouldn't it... because then you'd be depriving your humanity, and freedom of choice, wouldn't you? Segovia was (talk) 18:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry
My mistake bringing up BLP. I've removed my comment, and your inappropriate response as well. Again, you need to look over WP:TALK. --Ronz (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks for removing both your and my response. In that particular case, it was the right thing to do. Segovia was (talk) 19:02, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Stupid mistake on my part. --Ronz (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Warning
You appear to be engaged in an edit war. As you see, several editors do not agree with your addition of the tag. In such cases it is better to first use the talk page and then edit it. Please note that another revert from your part on the page will probably lead to your block in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  12:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ummm... no. I'm not edit war at all. I'm using the talk page Talk:Andrés_Segovia to discuss an issue; and you're removing a tag before the issue is resolved. In fact you seem to be here simply to help out your buddy, User:Dr._Blofeld; rather than from any interest with the subject matter, which is related to article content. (By the way: perhaps the tag with multiple issues, would be even better). Segovia was (talk) 12:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

See my comments on the talk page. I've rewritten a criticism section. However at present the negative views far outweight the positive. You need to write a solid paragraph of similar length to the current one first discussing the areas of his playing which were widelty praised and the stronger aspects of his work. Then you balance it with criticism. Dr.  Blofeld  - 15:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC) 14:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've replied at the Talk:Andrés_Segovia page. Segovia was (talk) 16:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)