User talk:Segrim

Welcome!

Hello, Segrim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 15:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of "Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours"
A page you created, Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 15:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC) Delete the page, please. It's not interesting for me. Untill you not undone the March 5, 2011 deleting my editing "Tensegrity" page in Wikipedia, all the debates with your team are not interesting for me.--Segrim (talk) 14:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
If you answer the question on my talk page I will give you a reason  Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 17:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Tensegrity
Hi! A am Segrim, March 5, you made deleting all my information with the explanation: “you need at least one reliable source for this: removing till that happens”. If you are THE PROFESSIONAL, let's see the file:Plat_16x2_1.jpg and think a little. It’s truely "tensegrity structure". My X-details are similar Kenneth Snelson's (1948) X-Modules and each my rod due to "applying a perpendicular to the axis of the rod lateral load" became "not experiencing the bending moment". Is it unexpected for you? The shown structure was made "by a continuous net" (all "field" is truely ONE CABLE). On such a structure I got my own "WORLD RECOGNIZED PATENT". It's not enough for you? Perhaps, you also have patent, in which you are "the only author" and you know, how difficult is such way? March 6, 2011 Segrim (segrim@bas.lv) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Segrim (talk • contribs) 12:54, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry patents don't count as a reliable source for verifying that the material is notable, but they can be used to prove that you invented it.


 * The problem is that anyone can write virtually anything in a patent, there's no formal verification that it's true or important or useful or anything much, only that nobody else has published it before.Rememberway (talk) 20:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * We just need a single reference to an editorial controlled (preferably peer-reviewed), widely acknowledged published source, and it can go right back in though.Rememberway (talk) 20:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Incidentally, the policy is here: Verifiability- patents are considered self-published sources.Rememberway (talk) 20:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, dear Rememberway! As evidence of the significance of my designs, I can cite the following arguments:
 * In those days, when my designs were in the section "Tensegrity" Wikipedia, on two English-language sites (http://www.ask.com, http://halloweenfiles.com) there were presented copies of this section to familiarize people with my designs - see the files Ask_com.doc, Halloweenfiles.doc. In search engine I've found these sites with the request "hammer.bas.lv";


 * on two sites in the same period, there were four pictures of my designs with direction to the source of them (see the files Laser_Cutter.doc, Janemartini.doc);


 * in those days into my not a commercial site for more information, contacted many people from the following countries: Germany (2), Spain (2), Macedonia (1), France (1), Portugal (1), Sweden (1), United Kingdom (1), Italy (1), Thailand (2), United States (8), Canada (1), Australia (2), Costa Rica (1), Kazakhstan (1), Ukraine (4), Latvia (6), Russia (54). In parentheses I wrote the number of hits on the site. I got such information because I, like webdesigner, had set to my site a special system from the company “Yandex” for collecting statistics. Unfortunately, this system is the Russian language, but the photo page of the report for the collection of statistics, I'm sending you (see the file Yandex.doc);


 * I first opened the section "Tensegrity" of the English-language Wikipedia, after I was sent here by American professor (Mason A. Peck, Associate Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University Ithaca, NY). Professor recently analyzed the significance of my designs and gave his opinion on them. I send you this conclusion in the form of photograph of professor's letter and in the form of readable text (see files Mason_Letter_2.doc, Mason_Peck_2.doc).

I think that this information is completely proves the necessity and importance of my work for so many people. In addition, an American professor Mason A. Peck is the known professional namely in this area. I am sending you a confirmative and check able information. All files, mentioned above in my text, I sent to you by e-mail permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I think, that for you will be easy to verify my information. I hope that after checking you will restore my edit in the section "Tensegrity". Sincerely, Segrim March 7, 2011.--Segrim (talk) 00:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Your stuff looks really good to me too, what you need to do is submit it, and get it published in a journal, and then I'd be quite happy with it being in the Wikipedia as well.Rememberway (talk) 15:07, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words. I feel that you are a true professional. Respect! I'll tell you about the first independent from me publication. --Segrim (talk) 15:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
I have an idea for your deleted article Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 20:56, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

reminder
When your done with it any you send it to me via e-mail, remember to use YGM when you send it to me, Thanks!--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 13:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
I answered some, but not all of the questions. I hope you can help me with the others. Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 19:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
hey where are you?--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 19:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
What? Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 12:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Space tourism
I removed those space hotel images because I wasn't sure if they were appropriate; having dug a little deeper, I'm now certain that they aren't. If they were based on designs drawn up by some official body, they might be relevant, but according to your website, these images are your own personal vision of what a future space hotel could look like. And I'm sure they're excellent examples of space architecture, but they're not really suitable for Wikipedia. You might want to read our policy on original research and the image use guidelines. I'm going to remove the images again, and I'd ask you not to replace them unless I've grossly misunderstood the situation. DoctorKubla (talk) 11:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)