User talk:Segv11

 ''Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, using headlines when [ starting new topics],and signing your message, using ~ .'' ''I will post my responses on this page. Please have a registered account, and I will also leave a note on your talk page. Otherwise, please indicate that you will [ watch this page] for a response. I will not respond by email, IRC, IM, or any other method that is not visible to the Wikipedia community as a whole.

''If I left a note on your talk page, then I'll also watch your talk page for a few days. Feel free to respond there or here, as you prefer. :)''



Welcome back!
Hi Segv11, I noticed you came back from a wikibreak. Welcome back! I think you would make a great administrator, though you should become active again before going through RFA. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-26 10:18Z 


 * I'm only partially back from wikibreak, and Real Life promises to keep me quite busy for the perceivable future. I wouldn't dream of going through RfA until I can give more time to wikipedia.  (That's why I removed wannabe-admin from my userboxes...)  Thank you for your vote of confidence though.  Segv11 (talk/contribs) 19:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:CIE1931simple.png
Thanks for uploading Image:CIE1931simple.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.


 * This image was made by editing a PD image already on wiki commons. This info was in fact in the image's edit history.  An appropriate tag has been added to the image description page.

Missing Greek characters
I think some of the upper-case Greek letters are missing from the list in the Characters section of Language recognition chart. If I remember my high school Greek, the alphabet starts Alpha, Beta, Gamma ... and the list starts with Gamma. There are other letters missing too, like Epsilon, Zeta, Mu, Nu and others. You seem to know your Greek and I'm not good at generating non-Latin characters on my keyboard. Do you think you could find the time to fix that? Thanks! Truthanado 02:45 23 March 2007

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Montreal Metro
Template:Infobox Montreal Metro has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Secondarywaltz (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Berkeley Review of Education


The article Berkeley Review of Education has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)