User talk:Seichim

Seichim
Hi I hope you don't mind, I redirected Sekhem to Seichim as the content was almost all there, and I added the extra bit into Seichim. We could discuss whether people use the words in any different ways there.Merkinsmum 23:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

proposed merge of Seichim into Reiki
As someone who contributed to the Seichim article, I'd very much appreciate your views here Talk:Reiki. (the artist formerly known as Merkinsmum.) Sticky Parkin 01:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

deletion debate for Seichim
To discuss whether it's been discussed in sufficient papers etc. Articles for deletion/Seichim- Just thought I'd let you know. Sticky Parkin 00:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Seichim and Sekhem
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Seichim and Sekhem. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Sekhem scepter. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sekhem scepter - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ErikHaugen (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Seichim and Sekhem discussion
In reply to your note at Talk:Seichim and Sekhem: Yeah, discussing the redirect at the talk page of the article is fine, another place might be the talk page of the user that made the redirect. You can go to the file history and see who did it and post a note on that person's talk page. A couple points, though. First, the title Seichim and Sekhem has little chance of survival. If a word has two spellings we just pick one, hopefully the most common, and have the other redirect to the first. It might make sense to have a Seichim article and have Sekhem redirect to that. I'm assuming the two are the same, just alternate spellings of the same word - Talk:Seichim suggests that this might be debatable, so if you change where Sekhem redirects please address that point. Second, and this is the real heart of your note, is should there be a separate article for Seichim? The answer really comes down to whether there is significant coverage in reliable 3rd party sources - please see the general notability guidelines to see what is required for inclusion as a stand-alone article. See the discussion here: Articles_for_deletion/Seichim - there was "community consensus" that the sources required simply weren't there, and that it would be best to have a section on Seichim at the Reiki article. If you know of good sources that were not known at that deletion discussion, then I think you could revert the redirect on Seichim and add those sources to the page. If you do this I would put a note on talk:Seichim that you are addressing the concerns brought up at the deletion discussion. Please let me know if I can help with any of this. It might be best, though, to just create a section at Reiki about Seichim? To use your analogy, if the holy grail were itself not notable (as defined here) but the Christian church was, then it might make sense to have holy grail redirect to christian church if the holy grail was discussed there. ErikHaugen (talk) 22:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 08:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mrmatiko (talk) 16:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 20:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sekhem infinity-2.jpg


The file File:Sekhem infinity-2.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image, no encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)