User talk:Seiya

October 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Deportation of the Crimean Tatars. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 12:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

I see you have been warned in past not to do edits of others. Please don't do this again and remove properly sourced content. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I don't understand what sort of claims you're making on my talk page. Anyone can comtribute freely, within rules. You seem have to reverted in the past also as I see from the notice above. Regardless, reliably sourced content shouldn't be arbitrarily removed. Let's accomadate all views. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 17:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Royal Tenenbaums
Hello Seiya, I appreciate the kind words in this GAC review. Usually, though, reviews are meant to be more robust and make reference to meeting the good article criteria, particularly from a novice reviewer. While I appreciate the pass, I'm a little concerned it won't be seen as legitimate. Ribbet32 (talk) 16:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Seiya, so you know for the future, it's very unusual to open and pass a review at the same moment. Ribbet32 is right: if a more complete review that followed the GA criteria had not been posted, your review might well have been reverted. It is also very unusual for nothing at all to be found in the course of the review, though in this case the prose, at least, seems to have avoided even typos. Did you do a spot-check of the cited sources to be sure the article accurately reflected what was in them? Did you do a check for potential copyvios and close paraphrasing? All these take time.
 * Doing an open-and-pass also prevents notifications from being sent: first, that the article is under review, and second, that it has been passed: it won't do both on the same run, and without having previously done the first, it won't do the second, since full reviews are expected to take hours if not days. It also prevents the article from automatically receiving the GA icon. In a typical GA review, the review page is opened (which reserves the review to you and prevents someone else from opening it and taking charge while you're at work on it), and the review is then done and the results added, which can be done in a single post or in several chunks. You might want to look over the GAN information, which goes into further detail on reviewing. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Deportation of the Crimean Tatars.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Deportation of the Crimean Tatars.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deportation of the Crimean Tatars.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Deportation of the Crimean Tatars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Deportation of the Crimean Tatars.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Deportation of the Crimean Tatars.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)