User talk:SeizureSalad

Sir Charles Broccoli
I've added the "prod" template to the article Sir Charles Broccoli, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Sir Charles Broccoli. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.

(eww. that's an ugly template. Whatever.)

This was a joke, right? :) It made me laugh a little, since I actually knew who that Henry Cavendish is/was. =D -Ortensia 01:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC).


 * ...XDDD. You actually edited the 1724 article. Good job.(? should I be congratulating you for this? =D) -Ortensia 01:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * And the 1781 article. wow. ._. sigh, more reverting work for me unless someone else did it already. -Ortensia 01:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I also edited the page on broccoli, and that lasted all of thirty seconds. This started as a joke among my friends, and I wanted to see if I could subtley incorporate into Wikipedia. You guys are really, REALLY fast and catching nonsense, and I think that speaks to the overall quality of Wikipedia in general. Awesome community. Sorry for my little headache. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SeizureSalad (talk • contribs).
 * Sign your comments, please. :) Anyways, it's not like an active member or anything. I got to that page on accident. -Ortensia 02:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)