User talk:Selena Ebony

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Neo Jim Crow Art, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Donald Hooker, from its old location at User:Selena Ebony/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 19:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Selena Ebony, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Liancetalk/contribs 19:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Talkback
-Liancetalk/contribs 04:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Cnote in 2016 photographed by photographed Peter Merts.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cnote in 2016 photographed by photographed Peter Merts.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald "C-Note" Hooker (June 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald "C-Note" Hooker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Donald "C-Note" Hooker, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Donald_%22C-Note%22_Hooker Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Waggie&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Donald_%22C-Note%22_Hooker reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Donald "C-Note" Hooker concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Donald "C-Note" Hooker, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Donald "C-Note" Hooker


Hello, Selena Ebony. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donald "C-Note" Hooker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Donald "C-Note" Hooker concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Donald "C-Note" Hooker, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Donald "C-Note" Hooker


Hello, Selena Ebony. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donald "C-Note" Hooker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 01:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Many people are wondering why this article has not been approved. As a result a website was created for the proof the subject is "worthy of notice" or "note"—that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention. See https://www.c-note.org/the-press This website will confirm the subject checks all the boxes for this article to be published, thank you Selena Ebony (talk)
 * Hi Selena Ebony (talk)! I'd like to help you in this task. One reason the article was not approved was because it actually was not submitted as far as I can tell, and it remained in the draft space without some issues being addressed/improved for some time. Its not too late though. I'm happy to help you and jump on a videochat at some time. Please email me at heather [at] blacklunchtable [dot] com and we can find some time. There are a ton of Wiki conventions and protocol that would be good for you to keep in mind before you submit the draft. --Heathart (talk) 18:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Look Up!
 * added links pointing to Vietnamese, Westmoreland County, New York and Syracuse

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Look Up! moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Look Up!, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

The term "Look Up!", has been used in different calendar years by established journalists, in established publications. These established journalist are, Sharon Mizota, Chadd Scott, and Brett Bralley. The following publications are the publications that used the term "Look Up" in the description of Artists' Billboards, Forbes, Los Angeles Times, and the Newsroom for San Jose State University.

One of the contributing sources in support of this article "Look Up!" is Sharon Mizota. Mizota is a recipient of an Andy Warhol Foundation Arts Writers Grant, and an art critic whose writing appears regularly in the Los Angeles Times. In 2008, the title of a Los Angeles Times article she authored on Artists' Billboards was entitled "Look, up in the sky! It’s women’s art."

Another one of the contributing sources in support of this article "Look Up!" is Chadd Scott. Scott covers art and travel for Forbes.com in addition to owning and operating seegreatart.art. In 2020, Scott's opening to his Forbes article on Artists' Billboards went, "Look up. You may see work by your favorite artist."

The third contributing source in support of this article "Look Up!" is Brett Bralley. Bralley is an editorial, marketing, and UX writer and editor specializing in science, technology, and innovation. Her work has appeared in higher education outlets, such as Washington Square (San José State University), UAB Magazine (The University of Alabama at Birmingham), Celebrate (Hoffman Media), Coastal Living (Meredith Corporation), Lookout Alabama, The Anniston Star, and more. In 2021, Bralley's opening to her San Jose State University's Newsroom article on Artists' Billboards went, "There’s a new art exhibit opening this week in San Jose — but you won’t find it in a gallery. Instead, look up."

If multiple reliable publications have discussed a topic, as the case here, across multiple calendar years, this improves the topic's probability of being covered in Wikipedia.

The subject matter of these Artists' Billboards that have been described as Look Up! are based on the use of billboards for addressing social issues. The term Artists' Billboards is based on an academic paper by Colombian artist Patricia Correa published in Theory Now. Theory Now is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal of contemporary critical thought.

Every reference in this "Look Up!" article is supported by reliable sources who speak to an art exhibition on a billboard as being related to a social justice issue.

Three references, two of which occurred in the same calendar year used the term/phrase Look Up! for mass public dissemination. In 2015, The Billboard Creative was the curator of an event featuring 14 artists from seven countries. In utilizing the services of PR Newswire, published the following press release, "Look Up! Billboard Creative Art Show Open on the Streets of L.A. Through May 15."

In 2021, Silicon Valley Fine Art and Real Estate Broker Anna D. Smith curated two billboard events. In utilizing the services of Eventbrite, an online event management and ticketing website for mass dissemination, published the following titles to these events, "Silicon Valley's Newest 'Look Up!' Exhibition Tickets, Oct 18 - Nov 17, 24-hours, and "Anna D. Smith's 'Look Up! 2' Hope & Beauty Art Exhibition Tickets, Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 1:00 AM."

Published means, for Wikipedia's purposes, any source that was made available to the public in some form.

The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content.

Across decades, in different calendar years, Artists' Billboard curators and journalists have used the term or phrase "Look Up!" to describe an art exhibition involving Billboards. I sincerely hope you will restore the article back to Wikipedia.

Reference
Selena Ebony (talk) 00:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Look Up! for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Look Up! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Look Up! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * This is a summary to the supporting proposition as to why Look Up! should not be deleted, but published on Wikipedia. Across two decades and in different calendar years, predominantly art journalists and grassroot curators of billboard art exhibitions (Artists' Billboards), have described these events as look up. Selena Ebony (talk) 21:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)