User talk:Seleucidis

*** This user is inactive ***

Welcome!
Hello, Seleucidis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Malerooster (talk) 01:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Sockpuppet investigation
I have started Sockpuppet investigations/Russavia, where you are named as a possible sockpuppet or meatpuppet. Fram (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to joe job Russavia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

One administrator's opinion: The timing (first edit just after Russavia's recent block) and subject matter of your contributions (addressing Russavia and others in the manner of an experienced contributor) makes one of the following scenarios appear possible or even likely: (a) this is an attempt to "joe job" Russavia by creating the impression of block evasion by him; (b) this is in fact a sockpuppet or meatpuppet account of Russavia (deemed unlikely by a checkuser); or (c) this is an account created to evade scrutiny, and possibly also to evade sanctions, for another reason by another experienced contributor. In either of these cases, the block would be appropriate. However, the explanation advanced by you is not entirely implausible either, and it is potentially verifiable. I recommend that you post, below, links to discussions you (as Seleucidis) had with Russavia on other projects. This would alllow us to evaluate how likely it is that you are, as you contend, not just an account created for the purpose of interfering with the disputes in which Russavia is involved. In addition, you must convincingly explain why you are also operating the account, as determined by checkuser at Sockpuppet investigations/Russavia/Archive.  Sandstein  15:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Perhaps this will answer your questions, Sandstein. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * No.  Sandstein   17:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

I have unblocked user:Hortensja Bukietowa. I don't think that it is useful to unblock this account, but I am happy to consider it if you believe it is desirable. John Vandenberg (chat) 07:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

to the Seleucidis user page, and to the Hortensja userpage. --Seleucidis (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I would like the Seleucidis account unblocked. I am now fully aware of en.wp's sock policy. I will add:
 * Fair enough. John Vandenberg (chat) 19:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Done: and . Thank you very much. --Seleucidis (talk) 20:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry and thank you
Hello my dear friend, I am deeply sorry that this community is so lacking in good faith that you were caught up in English Wikipedia politics which is driven by petty vendettas and other petty bullshit. O kurwa absolutne! much :)

And thanks a lot for the barnstars you gave me. As you know I can't comment on 2 of them due to them being related to *censored* and *censored*, but thanks a lot for them all the same. :)

Cheers, Russavia (talk) 03:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ^ Above user has been blocked for multiple reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.18.219 (talk) 21:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)