User talk:Self (Musician)

Welcome!

Hello, Self (Musician), and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Self (Musician), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Safiel (talk) 04:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Self (Musician)


A tag has been placed on Self (Musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Safiel (talk) 04:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Self (Musician), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Self (Musician), to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. No more pages about yourself, please. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Self (Musician), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Self (Artist)


A tag has been placed on Self (Artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 10:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Self (Artist), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Removal of CSD templates, recreation  of previously  deleted pages, and COI. Kudpung (talk) 10:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Self (Artist), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Kudpung (talk) 10:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Self (Musician)


A tag has been placed on User:Self (Musician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at User:Self (Musician), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * It's not just about removing tags - you have to stop trying to use Wikipedia purely to promote yourself. Have a read through the links in the Welcome message, above, to understand what Wikipedia is about. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I understand and I'm not promoting myself. Self is a friend, I can edit somethings on the page to make it a neutral point of view.  Will you allow access back to my page then?
 * Are you there?
 * Well, I can't let you back, because I'm not an admin. But what you have to realize is that the problem is not neutrality - it is notability. If you cannot provide evidence that your friend is currently notable (as per the general WP:N guideline, or the specific WP:NMUSIC criteria), your friend cannot have an article here. And if you are allowed back and you recreate the article again without proof of notability, you will almost certainly be blocked again. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * How can you not release my page if you're the one who blocked it. As well as I have reliable sources to put on the page.
 * Are you there?
 * No, I am not the one who blocked you - if you look at the block notice, above, you will see it was User:Dabomb87. Also, it is customary for a different admin to review unblock requests, so you will have to remain patient and wait for one to attend. What I suggest you do, if you say you have reliable sources, is present them here so we can assess them - I'll be happy to do that for you. (But please note that I am not here continually, and I just pop in from time to time - so if you want a reply from me you will have to wait until I next swing by). -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * http://www.reverbnation.com/selfinc is a reliable source. Now can you release my account.
 * From what I see at http://www.reverbnation.com/selfinc#!/main/about, it appears to be a marketing site used for self-promotion, where people can say anything they like about themselves. That makes it a primary source, which means it is not a reliable third-party source - see WP:RS for what constitutes reliable sources. What we need to see is multiple independent mainstream sources talking about him. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)