User talk:Selmo/Archive 5

Thanks for your taking care of the previous accidental edit on my talk page
I guess I'll archive sooner or later too. I was just going to add that I don't and didn't actually mind the reversion of the accidental warning. It was totally ok, I understand. I wouldn't have linked to it in a note to you previously except for concern people wouldn't understand I didn't intend bad faith. This interchange was not very important. Carry on with your important work. I am sure you are doing a lot more substantive work than I've had time to do at wikipedia in a while because I've been busy outside this community. I haven't checked but I'll bet you have written a lot more articles than I have, so I do regard you (and most editors) as established. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, Bebop 05:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT
Your recent bot approvals request has been approved for trial. Please see the request page for details. -- RM 15:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

MedCabal
Hi, we have a heavy backload of cases at WP:MEDCAB and since you are on the mediator list I thought I would request your help. Thanks! --Ideogram 10:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Taskforces
I changed the Workgroups so now "Taskforce" links to a page about Taskforces rather than the To do Tasks list. I believe this way it'll be less confusing. Also it might make it easier to have all the taskforces listed together so its easier to manage and reduces the number of small subpages related to the Wikiproject. Mkdw talk 00:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

More reverts needed
Hi. I noticed you had reverted a couple of entries by 24.154.55.9; I also noticed at least one other page that needs reverted. I'm guessing that this option is available to admins. Would you check the edits by this person and perform some more reverts? I noticed some potential problems with the "Cola" page - I don't know the facts about the flavoring, but the edits look fishy. Thanks. Skumarla 06:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for showing me how to do this myself. Skumarla 05:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Crab People
Whats wrong with putting the image in there? It looks loads better and I didn't read anything in the article you cited that said I couldn't. Putting a picture of Crab people makes it look unique. Just having a CP there does not. -- Scorpion0422 22:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Folding@home
Too many stub sections, references and bibliography needs to be merged and use in-line citations, the size of images, along with a bulky makes it very hard to read. -- Selmo (talk) 04:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I would appreciate if you were to be bold and edit the article, please?--Records 19:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

== Updates ==


 * Reference &amp; Bibliography merged as per suggestion of User:Selmo --Records 01:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Added new section for Google Compute &amp; F@H with more information. --Records 02:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Improved Lead. --Records 02:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Removed bulky quote as it is not encylopedic. --Records 02:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Removed See Also as links in article direct to See Also articles, besides FA articles don't have see also eg. todays one.--Records 02:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Removed BOINC section as they dont plan on releasing a BOINC client in the near future besides the stand alone is more easy for newbies.--Records 02:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Changed Progress to Participation. --Records 02:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * After this "explanation" I am totally opposed to this article being nominated. User continues to spam talk pages for his cause and has admitted personal gain motivations. pschemp | talk 03:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Did you know...
I've updated the Did you know... section. The format for suggesting and archiving them now matches the Showcase. I thought making all the formats match for 'common look and feel' on the Portal would be important. I've also changed the format to the Did you know... section so now each month new DYK's will rotate. We can even repeat past DKY's, but changing them regularily will make it more interesting. I've assigned you as one of the DYK Directors along with me. If you don't want to be the DYK Director you can remove your name from the list. The Portal's looking great and vastly improved. Mkdw talk 07:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh by the way, thanks for editing the VP Showcase template. I was trying to figure out how to do that but it was driving me insane. Mkdw talk 08:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I think we're close. The News section could still use a lot of work and the Vancouver topics section will need to be greatly expanded. I took a look at London's Portal and they have quite a few info boxes at the bottom. I've found our Vancouver info boxes not to be entirely complete. I think if we're able to accomplish that, we should be going into the featured portal review in a good place and the minor changes following will be handled with ease. Mkdw talk 20:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Anders Myrvold
Regarding your revert : I edited the page in accordance to the comment by Krm500 (above yours in my talk page) that hockey players infobox should only include teams from the same league. So which is it, exactly ? 83.192.61.106 17:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for notifying me about the Harbour Centre pic. I was a little surprised it was chosen, because personally, I didn't like that pic. :) -→ Buchanan-Hermit ™ / ?!  04:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Eartha White
im sorry about that. i was trying to fix her page. i never really knew about her until they threatened to change the name of the high school i attened. there trying to change Nathan Bedford Forrest to Eartha M. M. White. Once again i appoligize about "erasing the article". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YoungCorey (talk • contribs) 01:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

Its fine

Hastings, Ontario
Your reasons for failing the Good Article nomination:

Please add a lead section for "media" --I have now done this.

Plese convert the newspapers subsection into a paragraph --I have now done this.

Please expand the history, government, and education sections --I would appreciate if you read any of my other comments, I am unable to expand these sections any further, and I do not think that should hinder the article's chances of becoming a good article, or at least meeting the criteria.

Finally, please introduce more citations. --I have cited all necessary information, I believe; could you give some examples?

Thank you for your time and effort,

--Dhastings 00:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I have expanded the Education section as much as possible. There is nothing important that I can add to the Government section. As for History, there is literally no information for the 20th century, so I do not think the article should fall below Good Article criteria just because of that. After all, its quality not quantity.

--Dhastings 16:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

InShaneee RfC
I saw your note on the RfC for User:InShaneee and checked the logs. The "self-unblocking" was fixing an inadvertent mistake dealing with an alternate/imposter prevention account and doesn't really fall within the rule against an admin unblocking his or her own main account. If it had been improper, I think someone would have noted it at the time. Regards,Newyorkbrad 20:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. I had seen that it was deleted and didn't want you to get upset about that ... I didn't realize you had deleted it yourself, probably because of the automatic edit summary that was generated when you deleted it. Regards, Newyorkbrad 20:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Read well waht I write
This is a very delicate matter and I am trying to be very delicate to express myself.Veritas et Severitas 03:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

What the hell?
Why did you just fuck up my userpage? oTHErONE (Contribs) 23:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll choose to assume good faith, since it looks like you were using a bot. oTHErONE (Contribs) 23:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 11th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Admin coaching, etc.
Are you ready to get started?

The waiting time over at Admin coaching is long (some people have been waiting in line since July). I'm an admin coach with the project, and for my students I set up a group discussion page so that we could all learn from each other. The scope of this concept has expanded into the Virtual classroom, which is an open forum for the teaching and learning of advanced Wikipedia skills.

Anyone and everyone is welcome to participate, as a student, as a coach, or both. Every week or two a new major topic of discussion or classroom assignment is introduced, usually with a guest writer who presents his or her expertise on the current subject and who remains on hand to answer questions. Everyone is encouraged to participate in the discussions, such as sharing your expertise, asking and answering questions, etc.

The current topic of discussion is vandalism, and our guest writer is Budgiekiller.

All discussions are open-ended, so all previous discussion topics and classroom assignments are still there for viewing and further participation. There are also sections for posting miscellaneous topics and questions, requesting coaching assistance, etc.

In addition to inviting those who would like to learn, I routinely invite experts from all over Wikipedia to come and contribute for the benefit of all. The VC is rapidly turning into a clearing house of the best resources, methods, and techniques known for working on Wikipedia.

You are cordially invited to participate.

Here's an announcement box which you can place on your userpage or at the top of your talk page for keeping up to date with classroom assignments.

I hope to see you there. Sincerely, &amp;nbsp; Th e Tr ans hu man ist &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 07:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Outline
It is the conventional practice for "outlines" to be "staggered" with respect to the left hand margin of the page in any written display; and, especially, the "outlined" text simply comes out that way any time that you use a computer soft-ware generated "outline".

I suggest that you revert my alterations; because if you actually look at the actual current wiki page, and compare it with what it actually looked like before you changed it, you will see that my alterations present a far better looking page than that which your "reversion" offers. I suggest that you revert your changes, and do not consider my changes "vandalism". Perhaps I was wrong (a) not to sign them, and (b) not to identify what the changes were about. Now, it is up to you....129.94.6.28 05:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your revert to Talk:Land of Fire
Hey, you just VP'd a legitimate question on a talk page. It was a stupid question from an anon editor with poor spelling to boot, but it was a far cry from vandalism. Treima 03:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Admin coaching
I've matched you with User:Gray Porpoise. Please contact him to get started! Good luck, Fang Aili talk 18:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm ready in addition! I took a look at your contributions, and it looks like you'll make a worthy admin someday. Is there any area of editing in particular that you think I could help you improve in? -- Gray  Porpoise Your wish is my command! 02:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I'll try to come up with something. -- Gray  Porpoise Your wish is my command! 21:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

BC municipality infobox and BC portal
if you wish to center the portal link below the table in British Columbia municipality infobox, you could use the following code (I included the lines above and below the changes): | align="center" colspan=2 | }} However, the portal link can be easily added to the articles manualy, offering more choice about its placement. --Qyd 23:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * align="center" colspan="2"|
 * }
 * }
 * Oh, OK, disregard then (I misinterpreted the colspan=2 parameter).--Qyd 00:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

SkyTrain
So far so good, but I have to apologize in advance for not noticing this before. I have one more issue. Look at where refs 9 and 11 are at in the text. This is a huge gap, entire sections don't have refs. Can you add at least one ref per section/every 1-2 paragraphs?Rlevse 22:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

RFA suggestion
I suggest you withdraw your RFA. Although you have made great strides since September, it's really impractical to have an RFA after 2 or 3 months, as people rarely change their minds or their views of you in that time. Worse, if you do this often, many will vote Oppose for you in later RFAs (even if you are qualified) because you have had so many RFA noms in the past. Judging from your current votes (and it just started), it would harm you less if you called quits rather than stayed through the whole thing.

Nothing but friendly advice, Sharkface217 20:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Good luck Selmo. I hope this RfA doesn't stop you. ← A NAS  Talk? 11:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT
Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. -- RM 13:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi. Per Ram-Man's final approval, I've granted a bot flag to Selmobot.  Cheers,  Redux 00:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

My recent RfA
Thank you for considering my RfA. It was a very humbling yet surprisingly gratifying experience. I am grateful for all the constructive comments that will undoubtedly make me a better contributer, and hopefully a stronger candidate in the future. Grika 15:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Editor review
Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Editor review/, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 01:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Portal:Vancouver
Want the Showcase Biography section? Mkdw talk 06:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I've made the changes. That should be a fun section. Mkdw talk 06:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)