User talk:Semperlibre

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. -AndrewDressel (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * }

Comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Burkina Faso
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I moved the comment that you left at WikiProject Burkina Faso to the project talkpage at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Burkina Faso. Hopefully you'll get more responses there.-- Beloved Freak  19:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Maybe email the company instead if you want to say well done. Smartse (talk) 14:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Burkina Faso
Hello, thanks for your message. I must admit, apart from your reference to my message above from August that I'd moved your talkpage post, I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. Is there anything in particular I can help you with? -- Beloved Freak  20:42, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

QBP?
No, I haven't read an Keith Code publications lately: just a few pages on his web site a few years ago. Why do you ask?

I can only guess that the rest of your message is in reference to my moving your editorial comments from 6 January 2010 out of the QBP article and onto its talk page where they belong. The talk page is by no means "a place to which only few biased characters have access". The talk page is exactly as public as the article, and any reader is welcome to read it and add to it. Perhaps you can provide some details about your objection to the article. -AndrewDressel (talk) 23:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I just cannot take you seriously! Semperlibre (talk) 10:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Fortunately, I do not take myself seriously either. I am, however, doing my best to write good articles given the guidelines of Wikipedia and the constraints on my free time. If you have something constructive to add, please do. If you have a specific complaint about something I or some other editor can fix, please make it. I do not see the point of your anonymous and rambling commentaries. -AndrewDressel (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Covenant Aviation Security. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Epeefleche (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Epeefleche. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:42, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Your contributions
Please stop adding your personal opinions and commentary to Wikipedia articles as you did here. Talk pages are the place to discuss article content, but please also note that Wikipedia is not a forum, and discussion should be limited to article improvements. Talk pages should not be used for general discussion about the subject. Your current actions are considered disruptive, and should it continue may lead to a block. I notice that you have been warned several times already, so I cannot stress enough that you really should take heed now. Regards, wjemather bigissue 20:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)