User talk:SenorKristobbal/Archive1

Kat Shoob

 * I understand you want the quotes but I really don't think they belong there. I was the person that created her page months ago, and then again when she was on ITV1 (The Mint). I knew the page would return as there is now no argument for it to be deleted. The removal of the quotes would not jeopardise the page. Maybe shorten them to a list of about 4 or 5. I really think there are too many. Plus, she doesn't use half of them any more. --Mr.bonus 15:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Anyway, thanks for getting it back. I wrote about 3 pages in MS Word with arguments why there is no reason for its deletion. I was going to list this in the disputes section and try to get it back myself but now I don't have to. Did you create a new article and ask admin to approve it? I needed at least one other person to back me up to get around the spiteful behaviour of the admin that removed it the second time. At least the page is finally back after all this time. Thanks again for saving me more trouble. --Mr.bonus 15:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey mate. Good job with the Kat Shoob article. I wanted someone to archive the debate and remove all the junk from her talk page, but I'm not to good at doing stuff like that in Wiki. I just thought I'd tell you that I put a redirect for Cat Shoob as many people think that is her name. Thanks again! --Mr.bonus 17:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Portsmouth Squad Box

 * Hi, no idea where you are getting the info for the squad box from but it is incorrect. As of today no squad numbers have been confirmed and James Keene is on a season long loan in Sweeden. Nuttah68 19:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The squad numbers on the official site are not current. The 4 shirt was allocated to Andres D'Allesandro in January, not Viafara. James Keene spent last season on loan (and is until December) and was not allocated a shirt number. Nuttah68 19:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Calm down, what attitude? I am merely pointing out that the information you are using is incorrect, something Wikipedia strives to avoid. As I said originally, there are no squad numbers at this moment and this site should reflect that rather than contain information that is out of date, and in places (Viafara), wrong. If you must use the numbers, this contains the squad numbers from last season showing who was wearing the 4 shirt, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portsmouth_F.C.&oldid=52115282. Nuttah68 19:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Needs your vote
Hi, Mr.Bonus here. Kat Shoob's page is up for deletion yet again. Go to her page when you have the time and inside This article's entry, tell them she is notable and about your admin approval to create the page. Thanks mate.--Mr.bonus 16:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

excitedish person
A Evertonian? Who likes Super Mario? Prefers the DS and Plays Pro Evo! Say it aint so! And loves thr Simpsons! And Loves Nintendo, but you let yourself down because you have a iPod. :(--82.152.209.70 11:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Surprise!
Have a look at your userpage - Thankyou:) HawkerTyphoon 19:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou!
Thanks for watching, and thanks for the barnstar! Be safe, HawkerTyphoon 16:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Tim Cahill
Hi, will you please explain why you have removed the link to the Millwall History Files, which was updated in August 2006 and replaced it with a link that is two years old? Cahill's fee was disclosed, it was £1.5 million. Best wishes, Lion King 12:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair point, BBC Sport has it at £2million, The South London Press at £1.5 Million! Who knows? The true amount will prob. never be announced - good work by the way. Be Lucky,Lion King 14:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

No probs! Blinding player or wot? Lion King 14:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

That's cos we taught him every trick in the book! Look after him OK? Oh, and good luck against that shower on the other side of the park! All the best, Lion King 14:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, "who's the illegitimate person in the red?" Take care Lion King 14:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

'Sme again, someone has just reverted my reversion on the talk page about the fee being disclosed. If you come in and say it's just press whispers, I'll agree it OK? All the best, Lion King 12:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Cheers mate, be lucky, Lion King 13:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Why is Delron Buckley in the History of Everton?
Firstly, I apologise for not consulting about a big deletion. However the material is already in the detailed history, (and it shouldn't be there either). We have already recognised that keeping the subject of Everton F.C. to a single page is impossible. The history on the main page can therefore only have the main events since 1878 but I cannot believe the signing of Delron Buckley is one of them. More detailed material must be put into specialised articles by creating summaries of each season. I suggest that an article is created called Everton F.C. 2006-7 season and we start adding similar events. Brief summaries of a season can go into the History of Everton F.C.. Delron Buckley can make it to the main page when he scores a hat-trick in the 2008 Champions League final. JMcC 07:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

OK I have created a section called 'Recent news'. This title should be an incentive for it to be regularly updated rather than the summarised history just expanding indefinitely with ephemeral material. JMcC 16:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Everton F.C. FA Nomination
Good luck with the Everton F.C. nomination, I'm sure the hard graft you've put in will give the article every chance. ⁂veila# 04:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * It's much better with the new images. I still want to do some extra tweaks and a final going-over before approving, but it's getting late so I'll do tomorrow (Friday), hopefully. Qwghlm 23:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Hmm, the only instance of the Evertongood image that I can find on flickr is Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0. The NonCommercial precludes its use on Wikipedia. Occasionally people express concerns about granting featured status to articles with potential copyvios in their history. I would suggest that the best course of action would be to try and contact pikesville through flickr and request the image be released under Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 instead. This way there can be no potential copyvio in either the history or the current version. ⁂veila# 05:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Done the copyedits I wanted to do - once these copyright niggles are sorted I'll definitely change my vote to support. Qwghlm 10:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

First, congratulations on the outcome. It all seemed to go very smoothly and was featured remarkably quickly. With regards the front-page submission: I would suggest using this as an opportunity to sing the praises of Everton on the front page of the wiki. Since it's only a lead-in, it doesn't have to be balanced, as long as it's all true and correct. Highlight the things that are most notable about Everton; Dixie Dean, years in the top flight, trophies won, Champions League foray and even the link to Liverpool FC. Having said all of that, you've certainly earned the right to cherry-pick (or totally ignore!) my suggestions on this, the FA happened only because of the efforts you put in. ⁂veila# 10:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I think the photo is a bit weak as it isn't really identifiable as relating to Everton (the MUFC submission used the club's crest as an example)
 * The repetition of "football club" and "founded"/"founder" makes the opening a little cumbersome
 * The sentence about "management team of" includes only Kendall's name, which is fine, but that would make it "management team headed by"
 * "They have not won a major honour since..." is very negative, consider; "Their last major honour was the..."
 * "They have been in the top flight longer..." implies that this is true for all clubs the world over (which is actually quite possible, but I wouldn't be confident making that claim)

Chelsea F.C.
Hi. I reversed your change to the article (switching the Stadium and History sections). I agree that it looks a bit awkward not having the history section first, but the club's history starts with the stadium, namely they were created to fill it. I think it should stay as it is for the sake of continuity. Regards. SteveO 23:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Gary Naysmith
No worries, I'm a Birmingham city fan, so I don't get out much :P. I'll rever El Carlo Blancos or the liek on sight, and give a test4im for being sillyy i reckon. HawkerTyphoon 23:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Liverwho?
Nice one! All the best, Lion King 00:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Fields of Anfield Road
There actually was discussion revolving around the merge template I added, but it occurred on user talk pages looking back at the history. I'm going to re-add and attempt to start a conversation on the article talk page this time around. Erechtheus 23:11, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

hi, you sent me a message
about some vandalism....but i havnt actually edited anything in ages so was wondering what this was refering to? ive been visiting this site long enough to know not to do vandalism, so i would appreciate it if you could point me in the direction of my wrong doing. could it have been someone else in my home or area?

thanks, sarah. User:84.13.243.161 17.49, 16 october 2006

Millwall Brick
'ello Mate 'sme again - will you do me a big favour and watch the Millwall F.C. page and revert anyone putting anything in about this defamatory nonsense, I have to go and do some work! Mind you, better than just seeing the inside of studios and watching the wheels go round I spose! I've mailed Stewart Till, and if he doesn't do anything about it, I will on my return. Cheers mate, Up The Toffees! Lion King 01:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome to the WP:MCB group. :) – ClockworkSoul 16:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ma05f01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ma05f01.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dixiecity.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dixiecity.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Page in your user space
I commented out the categories in your sandbox page User:SenorKristobbal/Building Site as they were making it appear in them categories with the mainspace, which is not a good thing. Thought I should let you know - remember to uncomment them when you add the content back into the article namespace. Qwghlm 14:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

This month's winner is RNA interference!
– ClockworkSoul 14:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

block
<<unblock|got this message. It appears I have been blocked for someone else's abuse...

Your account or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Dmcdevit for the following reason (see our blocking policy): This IP address has been blocked temporarily.CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address is being used abusively;the address has been blocked to prevent further abuse.If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please post unblock on your talk page, with a notereferencing this message. Please be sure to include the IP address (which should appear at the bottom of the block message).Administrators: Please consult with the checkuser who placed the block before unblocking.

Your IP address is 84.9.194.75. >>


 * Referred to the blocking admin (see here). Please wait patiently. Thanks. ⇨REDVEЯS 21:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the problem. I'll reduce the block to anon-only. Dmcdevit·t 02:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Andyjon.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Andyjon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 02:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Dixie Dean FAID
Thought you might be interested in this one. ⁂veila# 07:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Football AID 14 Jan - 21 Jan
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week. Turkcell Super League has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein!
– ClockworkSoul 18:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

David Weir
To clarify, the ever-reliable Rangers official website had the move down as a loan, and then changed it to a full transfer. Archibald99 17:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Football AID 21 Jan - 28 Jan
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week. Dixie Dean has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Re: Alonso14. Lest we forget they are the best fans in the world (self-proclaimed ) and kings of 'banter'...unlike us bitter blues of course. RoyalBlueStuey 11:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

The Apprentice UK
Megadeth is trying to become the FA Article on the same day as Everton, May 15, we need to get more support for Everton's page to become FA on May 15. If Megadeth is FA on the 15 it will be a sad day for Everton supporters. Max ╦╩ 16:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kit_body_white_shoulder_and_collar_on_blue.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kit_body_white_shoulder_and_collar_on_blue.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex  18:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Goodisonpitch.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Goodisonpitch.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex  19:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Evertongood.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Evertongood.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex  19:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for your Spoken Barnstar award for my Everton F.C. recording. Hassocks5489 12:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Everton crest.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Everton crest.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 20:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Everton crest.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Everton crest.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 20:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Derry City F.C./archive2
Hey there. Would you have any interest in contributing a suggestion or adding your support to the nomination of Derry City F.C. for featured article status? Cheers. Danny InvincibleTalk 02:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ohmygodronson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ohmygodronson.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:49, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stadium Aerial 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Stadium Aerial 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Football on the main page.
Just letting you know I've made a request for a football team article to appear on the main page for the start of the season. Today's featured article/requests Buc 07:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

James Milner PR
I’d appreciate it if you could contribute to this PR of James Milner. Also I’m away till the 13th so if your able to address any issues raised that would be even better. Peer review/James Milner Buc 21:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Ben sherman.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ben sherman.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wii_Balance_Board.jpg
I have tagged Image:Wii_Balance_Board.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast 18:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Andyjon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Andyjon.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 15:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

FAR
Everton F.C. is under FAR. Buc 15:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Everton crest.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Everton crest.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Newgoodison1.jpg
I have tagged Image:Newgoodison1.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject The Apprentice UK
As a member of the above project, you may want to participate in the discussion here. Dalejenkins | 20:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Winsford United Crest.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Winsford United Crest.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Byrne (football manager)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Michael Byrne (football manager), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I can find no Everton manager of this name. Google search reveals no information to suggest Michael Byrne has ever managed any club.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stu.W UK (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Everton FC Crest.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Everton FC Crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 08:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Everton FC FAR
nominated Everton F. C. for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.  YellowMonkey  ( new photo poll )  00:42, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dax Hoogerwerf


The article Dax Hoogerwerf has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable footballer who hasn't played a fully professional game.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 15:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Evertonfirstfacup.png
Thank you for uploading File:Evertonfirstfacup.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 01:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Catterick.png
Thank you for uploading File:Catterick.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 01:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Hagiology Publishing for deletion
The article Hagiology Publishing is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hagiology Publishing (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – PeeJay 17:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Details2
Template:Details2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -DePiep (talk) 13:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Details2
A tag has been placed on Template:Details2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)