User talk:SenoraLibellule

Greetings and Hallo from the United States: I am a new registered user as of 14 July 10. I have utilized Wikipedia though until the thought to input the entry I made there had been no reason to register.

I contact you for the purpose of clarity. Evidently a self-appointed administrator “Fram” deemed it viable to delete my 14 July entry, stating “Undid bunch of edits, made layout worse, introduced unnotable inhabitants per WP:BIO)”.

The edits you undid were not my edits. Changes to format were not made – whether they occurred by unintentional error via the ever infernal machine, I can not be certain and apologize if this was the case.

The addition to the list under “Famous inhabitants” I took care to ensure hyperlinks were active, grammar and spelling were correct, as well format i.e. spacing was accurately input (which is why there are 3 edits under my signature name). I entered the addition of the word “notable” for the Para heading to reflect “Famous and notable inhabitants of Genk”. Purpose: the individual I entered “bio” is Notable throughout various credible websites dedicated to promote unknown musician and artists. Stef Vanstiphout is gaining notoriety throughout the United States, Europe, and populations worldwide via his band "Mute Albino" debut CD music sales. This musician and artist is an Independent which disqualifies the terminology “Famous”; added “of Genk” for the purpose of correcting continuity of the Header (i.e. inhabitants of what, where?)

Stef Vanstiphout may not be famous or known in Genk, yet this must not dismiss the fact that he is gaining recognition outside of Genk. Such notability of Stef is positive reflection on Genk when a search return associates him to a home town region.

I understand the necessity of having administrators to maintain a cohesive and reliable source for information. However, to delete entries without notification to the person who has subscribed for the purpose of posting is disrespectful. It should be obvious that one would not subscribe if the input were merely a frivolous whim or self-indulgent act. I have to question the actions of one self-appointed “admin” whom would take such actions to delete, disregard the contributions of others without an exchange if there are discrepancies or questions as to the viability of the input. Per Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales “Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, written synergistically by the people who use it.” Hence, the consensus would be wider scope than the region in which you live, and must be considered prior to deleting an entry as non-viable or inaccurate to avoid no more than a mere act of censorship! In my honest estimation one whom is challenged to have the ability to do so is handicap to make a clear decision and should not have power to edit the contributions of others. Are the self-appointed administrators so notable they have no second thought to take such actions? For all the rest of us know in the world… you Fram could very well be an isolated senior citizen with limited accessibility to what is “notable”, or a child managing Wikipedia as a school project…

I am a 47 year old whom has been in the professional occupational world for most of my life, since 14. I find it distasteful that my input was deleted/dismissed as though it were a 12 year old child leaving graffiti on a wall… apology accepted, thanks.