User talk:Sensible name

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Sensible name! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije (talk) 11:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Speedy deletion nomination of Witton creek
Hello Sensible name,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Witton creek for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Red whiting


The article Red whiting has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not for storing information or materials unrelated to improving Wikipedia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 331dot (talk) 10:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Red whiting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red whiting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Red whiting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Red whiting, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 10:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Red whiting


A tag has been placed on Red whiting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kolbasz (talk) 10:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Atlantic sea carp
I get the impression you think it is necessary to reserve a space for this article. It isn't. You should create your draft article in your sandbox and only transfer it to article space when it's complete. Deb (talk) 11:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Albert Bridge, Brisbane
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Albert Bridge, Brisbane, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits to Chelmer, Queensland
Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chelmer, Queensland because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

Recent edits to Indooroopilly, Queensland
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indooroopilly, Queensland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.