User talk:Sentaso

Hello, Sentaso, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 00:12, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hex (cryptocurrency) (December 7)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Hex_(cryptocurrency) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sources are either not reliable or not about the cryptocurrency. Nothing suggests this can even meet the verifiability policy much less notability.

S0091 (talk) 22:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Richard Heart moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Richard Heart. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. signed,Rosguill talk 17:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Please be aware that there was an RfC at Talk:Nick_McKenzie/Archive_1 which discussed whether the lawsuit between Nine Entertainment and Peter Schiff should be covered in the Nick McKenzie article. Consensus was determined to be that the material should not be covered at all. TarnishedPathtalk 02:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Where exactly was Consensus determined? I reviewed and I don't see any concensus. There's a discussion, but no consensus. Sentaso (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Sentaso read the part in the top left that starts with "There is consensus to remove the disputed content". Tarnished</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 15:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I read it, the consensus was to keep the content, as acknowledged by "the numerical majority against removing the content"
 * How is a minority deemed consensus? Sentaso (talk) 15:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please read Consensus. If you believe the close did not adequately reflect consensus you may discuss it with the closer at their talk page. If after any discussion you still feel that your concerns aren't addressed you may request a review of the close at the Administrators' noticeboard. <b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 16:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * as per your source: "Consensus among a limited group of editors, at one place and time, cannot override community consensus on a wider scale."
 * This is what has happened, you're sending me to a WP guide that confirms consensus was not reached. Sentaso (talk) 09:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If that's what you believe then I've already told you above what you can do to challenge the close. Until such time as the close is overturned that is consensus. <b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 10:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I understand the word consensus, its odd you're using a WP guideline that goes against your claim as a reference point. Sentaso (talk) 10:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to try and debate with you about WP policy given that you've demonstrated you aren't interested in anything other than misinterpreting it in a manner that you feel makes you right. I've advised you what the RfC close determined consensus is and what you can do if you wish to dispute the RfC close. If you edit the article to insert the material again, without having had the close overturned, you will be reverted and then find yourself the subject of a noticeboard discussion. <b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 10:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You were dishonest with your initial reply stating "Consensus was determined to be that the material should not be covered at all" when the consensus was the opposite.
 * Tarnished is an apt username Sentaso (talk) 12:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * [REDACTED] mainly edits talk pages and stirs up trouble at the various admin notice boards. He's the very definition of a tendentious editor 31.219.133.189 (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Sentaso. Thank you. <b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 14:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @Sentaso: You have been asked to no longer edit User talk:TarnishedPath. If you post there again in the next three months I will block you. There are certain permitted exceptions but to keep this simple, make sure you do not edit that talk page again before September. Johnuniq (talk) 05:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Nick McKenzie
Tarnishedpath's source is MOS:EDITORIAL. You can revert it in a BLP 2.48.54.73 (talk) 12:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

 * This topic ban applies everywhere on Wikipedia, including talk page and project space discussions. Additionally, you are also warned that further incivility will likely result in further sanctions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)