User talk:Sentriclecub/20points

I'll discuss those line items with you if
Please make them each have their own header. That way it's easier to reach compromises, and is easier for others to understand. You do the first round of giving a title to each point, then put your argument for that point only, and let me reply, and we take turns. Ok? Sentriclecub (talk) 14:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You don't get to hold me hostage to your conditions. First you said you'd only discuss it if I got an account.  Now I have to format everything just so.  You claim to not like drama but your every action here invites and creates it.  I explained in detail above, #1-6 and 8, why your edit is not very good.  Your initial responses missed on every point. 165.189.91.148 (talk) 17:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I was wrong to ask you to consider creating an account. Honestly that was my escape outlet.  If you would have done so, I could have walked away from the article feeling smug (I would have been forced to, since I agreed to it, and wouldn't reneg).  That's completely not on the subject, so forgive my explanation.  The truth is that a debate is hard to follow, under your proposed numbering system.  Lets seperate every bulletpoint into its own section.  Again, you are dragging me into meta-discussion.  I don't want to say ''well my response to #2 is blah blah blah, my response to #3 is blah blah blah" how are other readers supposed to follow along.  I have 20 points higher than genius, you'd instantly lose in a clear format.  You want a discussion which lets you have the upper hand.  Please let each point have its own section on the talk page.  We can archive it after we are done.  I have sought feedback through email, and I was wrong for directing attention to your unwillingness to make a 30 second account to avoid a several hour debate. Sentriclecub (talk) 17:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * " I have 20 points higher than genius, you'd instantly lose in a clear format." -- that's sad. I am so very sorry for you. 165.189.91.148 (talk) 18:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * That was a mock on you. Read my edit summary.  Its what you sound like to me.  Sentriclecub (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 13:59, 17 October 2008 Sentriclecub (Talk | contribs) (19,227 bytes) (→I'll discuss those line items with you if: 20 points) (undo)
 * More support that I baited you, was that I am a "show preview" clicker. I wouldn't have left it all in italics, but I can admit I'm just tilting because of the 3rr warning from my talk page.  I am taking this page off my watch list.  Honestly, I'm so glad you took the bait and made fun of my poor syntax.  Real genius lies in creativity.  Okay, that's my final outburst, from the tilting.  I feel such a sense of smuggishness but at the expense of wanting to end this account and start a new one, from the taint of a 3rr warning.  I have already printed out your response, and I'm adding "20 points higher than genius" to wikiquotes lol.  But honestly I do owe you a lot of credit, I have a chess clock which I use to see how much time I actually spend studying vs wasting and of the last 5h 57min, I've wasted 3:48.  I "study" 10 hours every day, and usually only waste about 1.5 hr, you've put me in the red and I'll likely get a lower MCAT score, I'm aiming for a 41.  But you really did get to me, so take your small reward that after our 24 hour bans are over, this page is no longer on my watchlist, so you can kill the good version for good.  In return, thanks for being pwned by being pawned in a extremely elaborative display of creativity which was my final try in the pursuit of my smuggishness.  This post is career suicide for me editing WCC2008, and was result of such a terrible feeling over the 3rr I received.  But I needed a quick fix, I specifically needed you to only emphasize the first half.  I was hoping you wouldn't include the phrase about instantly losing in a clear format, but I'm glad you pulled the quote out of my post, and copied/pasted it back!  That's all I could have asked for.  Its such an esoteric artwork I've involved you in, that you won't fully understand how everything feels yet.  Let it sink in, and never forget the phrase 20 points higher than genius so beautiful I cry a tear of joy & laughter. Sentriclecub (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)