User talk:Seny P Arukattu

Welcome!
Hello, Seny P Arukattu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Seny P Arukattu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 (talk) 16:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Content requires reliably published sources that actually verify the claims made
Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nandita Swetha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  17:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Improperly sourced content
Hi, the content you keep trying to submit at Nandita Swetha is improperly sourced. You cannot use Wikipedia as a reference as it is user-contributed. See WP:RS. If the subject won an award, use a published source, like a web news article. This reference doesn't mention a release date for Idam Porul Yaeval, so you cannot use it to justify a 2015 release. Find a more specific source, please. I fail to see how a photoshoot is being used as a reference. What information does this support? You should find a better reference than this, again, one that is specific to the content you are supporting. Please do not resubmit this problematic content as it will be considered disruptive. And if you have any questions, please feel free to reply here; I've added your talk page to my watchlist. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * @Cyphoidbomb If the article I have sourced for Nandita Swetha is not reliable then why that article is having her name in that. Why dont you remove that article then. Example Puli (2015 film) and similary other movies too. And I have given the source of Times of India article. Times of India is a leading news paper in India. And if that cant be used as a reliable source then why all articles are showing Times of India as a reliable source. Please remove all those articles then. For example DOB of Nazriya Nazim Puli --Seny P Arukattu (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what you're confused about. Does this reference say "the film will be released in 2015"? If not, then find another source, please. As for your other question, I have already explained it: You cannot use Wikipedia as a reference. You can go into the relevant Wikipedia article and copy an existing reference that supports your addition and paste it into the Nandita Swetha article next to your added content, but you cannot point to another Wikipedia article as a reference. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh, and to directly address your question about Nazriya Nazim's birthdate, there are two references in the article that support that. Look under her photo next to "(age 20)" and you'll see them. The difference between that article and this one, is that you never provided a reliable source. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Block

 * User isn't quite understanding the corrections s/he's being given. Times of India is a reliable source, but this link, which talks about the release of a Idam Porul Yaeval soundtrack is irrelevant to this content the user added (in bold):


 * {| class="wikitable sortable"

! Year ! Film ! Role ! Language ! Footnotes
 * 2015 || style="background:#FFFFCC;"|Idam Porul Yaeval †|| Venmani || Tamil || Post-production 1
 * }
 * }


 * The reference is problematic because there's nothing in it that mentions a 2015 release and there's no mention that the film is in post-production. I'm not sure what's so difficult to understand about that. I'm also not sure what the editor's complaint is about the subject's birth date—there is no birth date in the article. It was removed two days ago. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * My question is if the film article can have her name in the article which you are allowing then why the artist can't have the film name in her article. The DOB was removed 2 days ago. But the wrong DOB was there for many months. Because of which the artist was struggling. 100s of volenteers of Wiki. And each one talking different system. I edited the article in discussion with another administrator and he has agreed my edits. And today if the links are not reliable then u should have removed just the links. There was no need of removing the entire details. Especially her new movies. Those movie pages are having her name in their article. --Seny P Arukattu (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Again, you're confused. Idam Porul Yaeval is in the Nandita Swetha article. As for the incorrect birthdate having been in the article for so long, that may have been remedied months earlier if someone had posted a request on the article's talk page months earlier, (hard to say becaue there are fewer than 30 editors with this article on their Watchlist) or, if there was no quick response (for instance after this talk page request) posting a help request at WP:HELPDESK may have proven fruitful. But that still doesn't change the fact that any new birthdate added would have to be supported by reliable sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The original removal of the previous birth date was done in response to a request made to OTRS. Like the one Seny wanted to add, it was unsourced so its removal was a no-brainer. I tried to explain that, lacking a reliable secondary source for the DOB, we'd rather not have one at all. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

March 2023
Hi Seny P Arukattu! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Unni Mukundan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)