User talk:SeonaMillar

Doug Barrowman
Hi Seona, I've kickstarted a discussion about the lead paragraph of Doug Barrowman's biography over on the Talk page. Just thought he wasn't really notable for the AML stuff so didn't include it in that paragraph. If anything, he's most notable for being married to Michele Mone, so we might want to include that there instead. Let me know what you think over there! ScepticalChymist (talk) 16:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)ScepticalChymist

Hi Sceptical. I'm sceptical that Doug Barrowman "wasn't really notable for the AML stuff" and that "If anything, he's most notable for being married to Michele Mone". Doug Barrowman is his own person with much of his own business that is notable! Thanks!! SeonaMillar (talk) 12:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)SeonaMillar

Hi SeonaMillar, just flagging here that I've requested a third opinion regarding the lead paragraph on Doug Barrowman's page. ScepticalChymist (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

God evening SeonaMillar. I just refused a WP:3O at Talk:Doug_Barrowman, because more than two editors are involved, but I have suggested ways you can progress a dispute resolution process. I did notice, however, that you have added the same material (I think) 14 times over the past six months. I note that you are a Single-purpose account, and I have to say that repeatedly adding the same material in this way appears to me to be disruptive editing. Please look at the Single-purpose account article linked above to understand why it will seem to other editors as if you likely have a conflict of interest or are indulging in WP:ADVOCACY. Why not contribute to some of the other 6,268,876 articles on Wikipedia - it will likely prove a more rewarding activity than pursuing the course you are currently on! Happy to discuss further; just give me a shout on my talk page. With friendly regards and all respect, Springnuts (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Springnuts. Lord give me more spare time to contribute to those other 6,268,876 articles on Wikipedia as well! As for Doug Barrowman's page, I edit it every so often, yet I see others are very fast to respond and counter-edit even later that same day, as if they have a vested interest. SeonaMillar (talk) 14:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Administrator note: If you readd the disputed material to the Doug Barrowman article without a consensus for its inclusion you will be blocked from editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)