User talk:Separino

Speedy deletion nomination of Information and communications technology academy
A tag has been placed on Information and communications technology academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. X X X antiuser 07:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. - X X X antiuser 08:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 09:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi!
Hello! I saw the article you created at Articles for Deletion today. If we decide to keep it, I'll help you wikify it so that it's more in Wikipedia standards. If you need anything, send me a message on my talk page or reply here. Thanks! Hardtofindaname 08:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * One policy we have is reducing and/or eliminating conflict of interest, where editors are discouraged from editing or creating articles which they may be biased in; one such example is that your boss told you to create this article for your company. In that case, you and anyone who is affiliated with your company shouldn't make edits or create articles that can be seen as advertising for your company.  Please read Conflict of interest.


 * However, this doesn't mean that your article can't exist. If you (or any editor, in fact) can find good, third party sources to back up the notability of this company, then it will be alright for this article to exist. The article must also be written so it doesn't sound like an advertisement.


 * Because you have a conflict of interest, our best solution would probably be for you to suggest changes to the article on the article's talk page. Editors can then look at your suggestions and tell you if it is acceptable to make those changes.


 * Hopefully this helps to explain the situation a bit more. If you have any more questions or concerns, I'd be glad to help.  Thanks, Hardtofindaname 09:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: I won't be around, by the way, until tomorrow (August 13 for me, I live in Hawaii). Just FYI, you can still leave messages to me. Hardtofindaname 09:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Just to let you know, the result of the AFD was keep, although the article needs a rewrite. Perhaps you could help find local sources for the article?  Happy editing, Hardtofindaname 23:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)