User talk:Sepetras/Evaluate an Article

Response
This is a good analysis of a relevant (for us!) article, SP. Nicely done. I think your evaluation raises a particularly useful question about sourcing: typically, Wikipedia prefers sources that are not original research or publications by the subject of the article, yet many of the sources refer back to UD-generated news stories, articles, etc. What other kinds of sources might be useful to improve the sourcing of the UD article? The UD sources provide necessary info, likely some kinds that aren't available elsewhere. So, how should we reconcile the content of sources against Wikipedia's need for peer-reviewed and/or third-party sourcing? Overall, this is a good example to evaluate! Pthomas4 (talk) 15:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)