User talk:Sephiroth storm/Archives/2009/July

Walt Disney.
Feel free to unprotect it, that's a rather long semi... not entirely sure why I did that, as the vandalism doesn't seem to have been too terrible anyway. Cheers, · AndonicO  Engage. 20:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

RE: Wicca
Hi Sephiroth. I have left a response to you here. Xxglennxx (talk) 23:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Stubs
Please don't add the stub tag to articles like Ravage (novel) which already have a specific stub tag - it clutters the Category:Stubs and wastes time of stub-sorters. Thanks. PamD (talk) 22:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Restoring contested prods
Please do not restore a contested prod like you did in this edit. Anyone can contest any prod for any reason and, as stated in WP:Proposed deletion, a contested prod can not be restored. There is no requirement to fix the article, or for that matter even to state a reason why one is contesting the prod.

Now, I do plan to fix the Ravage (novel) article when I get a chance, but please keep in mind that Wikipedia has no deadline. We don't delete an article just because it has some problems - if we did, most the encyclopedia would disappear.

Thank you, ThaddeusB (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry, my message was intended for the person who made prod request. I agree that the article should be allowed to be worked on, however, currently the article does not meet the guidelines for inclusion, because it does not make a claim for notability and can be deleted at any time. I suggest that if the article does have a claim for notability, you add that, and work on the rest of the article later. That would be my interpretation of DEADLINE, insure the article is withing regulations, then work on it.


 * I added a sentence to show its importance, which should protect it from speedy deletion at the least. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Good job, I look forward to seeing the article's completion. If you need any help, let me know. Sephiroth storm (talk) 17:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Ho is this?--Mr. Sanchez (talk) 16:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
You may be interested in the Welcoming committee. Try getting the script Friendly if you are.  • S • C  • A • R  • C • E •   07:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Requested link
Here's the link you requested. Cheers. —  C M B J  17:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Request for assistance
I am currently trying to help the editors in the topic area move away from POV pushing and personal commentary. (Please note: Talk:Falun Gong.) You are an editor that I believe can help facilitate this change. I am looking for some uninvolved people with experience and savvy to become involved in the editorial process. A review of the article and associated discussion, in a style similar to a good article review or broad RfC response, would be a good first step and very helpful. However, some leadership in discussion and editing as a whole would be invaluable and sincerely appreciated. This can cover a very broad range including (but not limited to) identifying article flaws, keeping conversation focused on content, reporting disruptive editors, making proposed compromises, boldly correcting errors, and so forth. If you are willing to help out, please look things over and provide your feedback on the Falun Gong talk page. Essentially, we need some experienced editors to put things on track. Any assistance in this regard is gratefully welcomed. Thanks! --Vassyana (talk) 04:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)