User talk:Serac73

Welcome!

 * }

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Utrecht has been reverted. Your edit here to Utrecht was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP6P00O-UGo&feature=share&list=UUk95vbtb7AKgat2klilKOCw) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Driven grouse shooting
Uncited statements such as "This reads as propaganda for grouse shooting, though: there is no reason why there should be more heather moorland than tropical rainforest", reveal your own bias and have no place within an article like driven grouse shooting; the tone is simply not encyclopaedic (if you can find a source, a comment such as "(though authority X points out that there is no reason why there should be)", with a citation, would be fine). And before you accuse me of bad faith, as it happens I also oppose grouse shooting and have attended Hen Harrier Day events, but Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Take it to the Talk page before reverting. Dave.Dunford (talk) 07:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)