User talk:Serge-kazak

Welcome!
Hello, Serge-kazak, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chornousov Ivan Yakovych, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gold   Standard  23:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial


 * Thanks for your attention! :) Serge-kazak (talk) 23:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Gold   Standard  23:30, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chornousov Ivan Yakovych


The article Chornousov Ivan Yakovych has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established by the references per WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Also, potentially contentious material exists in the article but I am unable to determine if the non-English reference accurately sources it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gold   Standard  23:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Gold   Standard  17:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse Invitation

 * Thanks for invitation. Serge-kazak (talk) 21:11, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Gold   Standard  21:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karsten Rohde


A tag has been placed on Karsten Rohde requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 21:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Gold   Standard  21:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Gold   Standard  22:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Gold   Standard  22:38, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Gold   Standard  23:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Chuchupak Vasyl Stepanovych (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Greens and Ukrainian Republic


 * Baron Aron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Ukrainian Republic


 * Chornousov Ivan Yakovych (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Greens


 * Red Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Ukrainian Republic


 * Red Cossacks Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Ukrainian Republic


 * Red cossacks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Ukrainian Republic


 * Ukrainian War of Independence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Ukrainian Republic


 * Yuriy Kotsiubynsky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Ukrainian Republic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bublyk Semen Pavlovych, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Soviet Republic and Ukrainian Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mykola Chalenko


A tag has been placed on Mykola Chalenko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kolbasz (talk) 11:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holy Rus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Heaven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

June 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Kozub Ivan Gnatovych, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 18:11, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Please explain more clearly, what did you dislike? Why you think so? What do you mean, using the word "disruptive editing"? From my point of view the speedy deletion of my article is more disruptive thing for our community than it's content. Please, explain your opinion. Serge-kazak (talk) 20:05, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Igor Besler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Besler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

July 2015
Your recent editing history at Red Army shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ( Hohum  @ ) 19:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * There is a group of people on Wikipedias, who fight against articles concerning the history of Soviet Union, Red Army, Ukrainian Republic, cossackdom (as free people by the will of God and not of some or other lord), red cossackdom (cossackdom under red flags) and so on. Their editions make damage to articles written about these topics by different people - among them also me ((( This people delete, delete and delete - making no discussion. ((( Is it right that they can rewrite articles as they want at the same time preventing other people to rewrite such articles? You can block me or everybody else - but you cannot block the Truth. Serge-kazak (talk) 12:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Semen Pavlovych Bublyk


The article Semen Pavlovych Bublyk has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not notable, deleted in Ukrainian Wiki"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Шиманський Василь (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Free Cossacks (concept)


The article Free Cossacks (concept) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The history of this page is rather weird, but anyway, it looks as if old reversions were resurrected and histmerged here? No idea why one would do this to create a completely unsourced article. The first of the two 'bullets' ends with 'see De-Cossackization', which doesn't use this concept (the only use of 'free' is in the navbox, as a link to Free Cossacks, the second bullet point). Moving this to draft seems pointless as it is so old (and yet brand new), so Prod it is."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)