User talk:Serge.rider

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article DBeaver, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 12:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DBeaver


A tag has been placed on DBeaver, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of DBeaver and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 12:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page DBeaver has been reverted. Your edit here to DBeaver was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://ubuntulife.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/dbeaver-cliente-universal-sql-multiplataforma-a-lo-eclipse-veredicto-me-gusta) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:45, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Keep trying
Hi there. I just wanted to say don't take the deletion nomination of DBeaver personally. We really appreciate your contribution; keep it up! I know it can all seem very daunting at first but you'll get better at it. Make sure you give the policies relating to notability and verifiability a good read and carry on editing. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at my talk page. Regards Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 12:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2017
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to DBeaver. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alexf(talk) 10:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)