User talk:SergeantBolt

{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px"  SergeantBolt's Talk Page: October 2006 - December 2006 |          My Archive  
 * width="55%" class="MainPageBG" style="border: 1px solid #000000; background-color: #00cccc; vertical-align:top;"|

Leave a new message.
 * This is my current talk page. Feel free to leave your comment here!  I will reply to you on YOUR talk page.
 * This is my current talk page. Feel free to leave your comment here!  I will reply to you on YOUR talk page.

Welcome to Esperanza!
Welcome, SergeantBolt, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

Hús ö  nd  23:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I came to greet you as well. Welcome to Esperanza.  I hope you don't mind me saying this, but Wp is no myspace, and your user page looks awful in decent browsers due to all the broken HTML in here.  I hope I've not offended you, but instead give you something to consider.  Again, welcome. --Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/ Saoshyant  talk / contribs 15:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

RfA
(copying message from my talkpage): ''Hello, Elonka. I have been pondering this for a while now, and I was wondering if you would object to me submitting an RfA for you - you are a wonderful user! SergeantBolt (t,c) 14:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)''


 * Thanks very much for the vote of confidence! And I may take you up on this, as I've definitely been pondering adminship for awhile now.  However, I'm also in discussion with a couple other people about such a nomination, though I don't know whether they actually have time to process a proper one at the moment.  So, would it be alright with you if I checked with them first, and then I'll get back to you?  Also, have you ever done an RfA nomination before, yourself?  --Elonka 10:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * No, Elonka, I have not subitted an RfA before however I understand the process perfectly after watching so many. You need not be worried! And yes, that's fine - it can wait! SergeantBolt (t,c) 21:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding! I did go ahead and check with the other individual, but he said that he's going to be busy with other things for the next few weeks.  Or in other words, yes, I thank you for your offer and would be glad to accept your nomination.  Let's go ahead and do this! :) --Elonka 07:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you again for the nomination. Though the majority of respondents in the discussion were in support, in the end, it was not deemed to be sufficient to prove consensus, and the nomination was unsuccessful. I do, however, very much appreciate the time that you invested in the nomination process, and found the discussion very worthwhile and instructive. Thanks again! --Elonka 06:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I'm wondering if...
I've read on your user page that you are a part-time writer. I've been working on a novel myself for quite a while, though not fan fiction. I had an idea recently, because I'm not a good writer and a few years ago I was even worse. I decided I'd apply an open source model to my own work, where volunteers would be able to see how my novel would be up to, and then submit small modifications, improvements, or rewriting what reads bad. Either like a wiki, or maybe a SVN like what's used on computer code.

Anyhow, why am I telling you all this? Because I haven't been able to kickstart this project yet, and my attempt to recruit volunteers on my website didn't work at all. So, I'm wondering if you'd like to help out. Feel free to reply either through talk page, or e-mail.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/ Saoshyant talk / contribs 13:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure. No problem.  That's pretty understandable.  However, if you think you know someone that would like to help, I'd appreciate if you could contact him/her.

IMDB Links
Hi, you can use the following syntax to generate imdb links for actors

so e.g. for the Alex Sabga Article

produces the result :

, which is the preferred way of including these links

Hope you find this useful. exolon 18:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
- On behalf of everyone at Esperanza I hope you have a great day! - Jam 01 01:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I wish you all the best on your wiki-birthday! I am sure that you shall continue to shine here and in real life too. --Bhadani 04:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Huzzah, one whole year! Congrats! -- Ci e lomobile talk / contribs 04:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Sydney Roosters FAC
I've taken your suggestions to heart about how to improve the Sydney Roosters article by adding in about half a dozen new references. Hopefully if you feel this is more than satisfactory (as it should be), you might want to reconsider changing your vote in this article's candidature for featured status. There are just a few more days left in the FAC and if you feel that it's good enough to be passed, then now is the time to change your vote or add further suggestions. Thanks, and all the best, --mdmanser 08:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:TomikoLee.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TomikoLee.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok  ☠  02:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:AlexSabga.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AlexSabga.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Rossrs 08:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Userpage award
I just added a userpage barnstar award to your userpage. I hope it is ok. I felt that your userpage easy/clear to read, and its style was sleek. Samaster1991 14:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Flashes before your eyes
Hi, I was just wondering why you deleted a whole bunch of trivia facts from this Lost episode article. People put effort into writing these facts, and you just deleted them without discussing on a talk page. It is called *TRIVIA* for a reason, and while some of it may be trivial, I think it is improper to just delete so many trivia facts. Who are you to judge what is "non-sensical"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elb2000 (talk • contribs) 02:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC).
 * SergeantBolt, I have to echo a concern here. It's one thing to delete random comments/vandalism by anon editors, and another to delete good faith additions from established Wikipedians. For example, you deleted some trivia that I added, with an edit summary of "completely irrelevant." Even if you disagree about whether some information is appropriate for the article, can you please try to ratchet the civility up a notch?  Thanks. --Elonka 18:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation! I agree, you've got an excellent reputation, and your actions were very perplexing to me.  I'm glad it's resolved now though. :) --Elonka 18:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation, but why did you remove the Trivia about Tricia Takanawa from Family Guy???Elb2000 10:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)elb2000
 * Oh whoops, my mistake...It was removed by a non-registered user, and I have now added it back. Sorry for the confusion.Elb2000 18:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)elb2000

The Man From Tallahassee
How come for The Man From Tallahassee page you just created a new one with the capital 'F' and made The Man from Tallahassee page with the small 'f' a redirect? Why didn't you just move it? -- Silva  Storm  

Expose/Exposé/episode 14
Not sure if you're aware of it, but it has been confirmed that episode 14 is Nikki and Paulo-centric...--Animé Dan 10:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Untitled 16th episode of Lost season 3
An editor has nominated Untitled 16th episode of Lost season 3, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 20:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Lost episodes
Hey SergeantBolt, I just nominated List of Lost episodes for Featured List status again and was hoping you could support or comment on the nomination at Featured list candidates/List of Lost episodes. Thanks. -- Wikipedical 07:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:NeilHopkins.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NeilHopkins.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 22:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Elonka 2
Thank you for your support in my latest Request for Adminship. Just as with the first one (thanks again for the nom), this one didn't succeed either, but rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months. :) If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, --Elonka 06:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use image
Hi, I don't want to clutter your page with ugly templates, but I'd like to let you know that Image:MichaelGiacchino.jpg is a replaceable image, and therefore not fair use. It will be deleted unless (with all due respect and God will it doesn't happen) he dies or becomes totally disfigured beyond photographic capacity. ALTON .ıl  08:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Elonka 3
Thank you for your continued support in my most recent RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate, that landed on WP:100! I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holiday season and all the off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools.  My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, and have a great new year, --Elonka 07:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:Band of Brothers episodes
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Band of Brothers episodes, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Band of Brothers episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Band of Brothers episodes, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Neil Hopkins
An editor has nominated Neil Hopkins, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

So...
you still writing that Lost newsletter? Gee, I'm looking forward to enstallment #2. justin

Orphaned non-free media (Image:StephenSemel.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:StephenSemel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:ByronChung.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ByronChung.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 15:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jennifer Johnson
A tag has been placed on Jennifer Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —S Marshall Talk /<font color="Maroon" size="0.5">Cont  17:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barbara Vidinha-Tyler


The article Barbara Vidinha-Tyler has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * roles listed fail to show notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Postcard Cathy (talk) 12:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Canon MVX100i
I have nominated Canon MVX100i, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Canon DV 012. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ejfetters (talk) 01:23, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello SergeantBolt! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Tucker Gates -
 * 2) Mikael Salomon -
 * 3) Paul Edwards (cinematographer) -
 * 4) Fred Toye -

Lost FAR
nominated Lost (TV series) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ω pho  is  16:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:TVQuick.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TVQuick.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Meilinda Soerjoko for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meilinda Soerjoko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meilinda Soerjoko until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:BooneDream.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BooneDream.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Degreesymbol 2.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Degreesymbol 2.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of John Simon Jones for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Simon Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Simon Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 08:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel A. Ortiz


The article Daniel A. Ortiz has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability, only source is IMDb.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mission Impossible Theme Michael Giacchino.ogg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mission Impossible Theme Michael Giacchino.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Suspense Music Medal of Honor Michael Giacchino.ogg
 Thanks for uploading File:Suspense Music Medal of Honor Michael Giacchino.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alexandra Morgan


The article Alexandra Morgan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of significant roles to meet WP:NACTOR. Lack of significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Bagumba (talk) 16:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Sabga for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Sabga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alex Sabga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:55, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott Underwood for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Underwood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scott Underwood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul A. Edwards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul A. Edwards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paul A. Edwards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Debra J. Fisher for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Debra J. Fisher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Debra J. Fisher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narky Blert (talk) 12:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lynne E. Litt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lynne E. Litt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lynne E. Litt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Byron Chung


The article Byron Chung has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Can't find sigcov in either Korean or English."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. toobigtokale (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)