User talk:SergeyLerg

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, SergeyLerg! Thank you for your contributions. I am Ashbeckjonathan and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 23:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Speedy deletion nomination of ZeroBrane Studio


A tag has been placed on ZeroBrane Studio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bisswajit  14:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Zerobrane
Restored here. If you recreate, you will need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I've made a couple of MoS changes.
 * I think you need more links, you are assuming a good deal of knowledge on the part of your readers. For example, your only link to Lua is tucked away in the infobox
 * Features. Lists of features look spammy and aren't good stylistically anyway. Better to write in proper sentences.
 * First para of debugging lacks a ref. Since you use loaded words like extensive, you need to ref that or remove the claim
 * Book refs ideally should have the relevant page numbers
 * Most of your refs are to non-independent sites like ZeroBrane and Kulchenko, or sources that aren't self-evidently reliable. Although the book refs are fine, they aren't easily accessible. You need a couple of genuinely independent on-line sources so that we can see if the software is actually notable. I know nothing about the topic, and I'm not convinced of notability by what I read. For all we are told, this software may only have been downloaded a handful of times. There are no reviews (positive or negative) from reputable sources included in your text. To me, there is nothing to differentiate this from all the hundreds of non-notable software (and bands, sports teams, authors etc) that try to post here. I may be wrong, but if this is posted, it is quite likely that another admin without an expert background will take the same view as me.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Looks a lot better. When you recreate, use the "Move" tab, don't cut-and-paste. Any problems doing that, let me know  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)