User talk:Sergey Mtr Bogdanovich

Welcome!
Hello, Sergey Mtr Bogdanovich, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:MetaTrader4 Supertrend Indicator, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 20:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:MetaTrader4 Supertrend Indicator


A tag has been placed on Draft:MetaTrader4 Supertrend Indicator, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 20:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Supertrend


A tag has been placed on Draft:Supertrend, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 22:07, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Sergey Mtr Bogdanovich, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  22:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorials
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Your two drafts
First, your two drafts are substantially identical. There is no need to make more than one draft on a topic. If that draft has been tagged for deletion, that's a strong signal that either the topic should not be written about or that, should the page be deleted, any new article be written "from scratch."

Second, Wikipedia editors have worked long and hard for many years to make sure that Wikipedia articles are as neutral in tone as possible, that they contain only encyclopedic information, and that they only contain articles about "notable" topics. MOST commercial software that caters to a specific niche market, in this case, stock traders, is not "notable" enough to even qualify to have a Wikipedia article, even if the article is very well-written and very neutral in tone.

Please read the links in the welcome messages above this one. Do a "sober assessment" as to whether this software title meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If it does, start over from scratch focusing on what reliable, independent sources say about it, NOT what the company, its resellers, or its customers say about it. Did it win any famous awards that would cause it to get mainstream press, sort of the software equivalent of an Emmy Award or Tony Award (I don't know of any awards for software that rise to this level, but they might exist)? Does it dominate a market segment that is itself large enough that the dominant product in that market is likely to receive significant coverage outside of the industry, or has it ever done so (e.g. NetWare)? Is the software a "seminal work" in its industry (e.g. VisiCalc)? I'm not saying a piece of software has to be "famous" like NetWare or VisiCalc, but like all other topics, it has to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements or it can't have an article written about it. Articles written about non-notable topics routinely get deleted. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  22:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, Sergey Mtr Bogdanovich. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 09:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)