User talk:Sergey Suslov

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, AnyLogic, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, AnyLogic appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. AnyLogic has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:AnyLogic and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:AnyLogic with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:AnyLogic.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AnyLogic
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article AnyLogic, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongomatic (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of AnyLogic
I have nominated AnyLogic, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/AnyLogic. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. EyeSerene talk 22:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Re your message
Thank you for your post to my talk-page. I've replied on the AfD page regarding the article; as to spam/advertising, it's a constant problem for many articles (and many are much worse than yours). The only solution is to regularly check the article and remove any inappropriate edits. I hope we can work together to keep your article, as from what you say I believe it might indeed be notable - we just need to prove it! All the best, EyeSerene talk 17:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Simulation-Approaches-and-Abstraction-Levels.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Simulation-Approaches-and-Abstraction-Levels.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Russian language sources
From WP:VUE, non-English sources are acceptable when there are no English-language sources of comparable quality, so to answer your question: yes, you can use Russian-language sources. Professional translations are recommended for verifiability, but in my experience these probably won't be insisted on. Hope this helps, EyeSerene talk 10:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I think the article is greatly improved and the references provide much of the verifiability we need. It may be helpful to establish early on in the article (perhaps in the lead) why AnyLogic is notable. Example text:

AnyLogic is a multi-method simulation modeling tool created during the late 1990s at Saint-Petersburg Technical University. Based on an earlier project funded by a Hewlett Packard research grant, AnyLogic is now developed by XJ Technologies and used by companies such as IBM, Boeing, General Electric, General Motors, Mitsubishi, and Siemens, as well as in universities worldwide.

We could really do with an independent reference for the "used by many companies and universities" claim (I'm assuming Yuri G. Karpov is associated with AnyLogic), but hopefully my suggestion is helpful in showing how notability can be proved. I'm fairly happy that with the improvements you've already made and the developments you are intending to make, we should keep the article. I'll withdraw my deletion nomination, but as you say others may have different opinions so the AfD will remain open until it's closed by an uninvolved administrator (normally around five days). All the best (and no need to apologise for asking questions, I will always try to help!), EyeSerene talk 16:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

German flagged revisions
I'm not very familiar with how the German Wikipedia operates, but I think you'll just have to wait until one of their article reviewers has checked over the unflagged version and marked it as good to go 'live'. I don't know how long this normally takes - sorry I can't be of more help. EyeSerene talk 12:49, 16 October 2009 (UTC)