User talk:Sergeysid

Flashspring
I have added a "" template to the article Flashspring, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Conscious 07:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Sergeysid, please don't remove the afd tag from . —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 11:56Z 


 * Sorry, i did it once, i just don't know what's the next step about the decision Sergeysid 13:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That's okay, no harm done, I put it back. You don't have to do anything - just wait for an admin to close the debate. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 13:58Z 
 * Now i don't see Flashspring page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flashspring. Is it a logical way of things? Just curious. Sergeysid 14:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually the debate was closed (by Majorly) as Delete, so the article should be deleted. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 14:07Z 
 * So this is all over and no FlashSpring mentioning at WP, right? Sergeysid 14:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Sergeysid, well, it's not the complete end. If you are keen on Wikipedia having an article on Flashspring, what I suggest you do is find more evidence of notability, then initiate a Deletion review.  The best kind of evidence you can get is a third-party publication whose primary subject is Flashspring (see WP:ATT and WP:N). —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-07 02:49Z