User talk:SergioAwoke

Hi there, Animalparty
I don't think I have difficulty writing a neutral article. I'm just exposing verifiable data from different and independent sources. Please proofread the article and make it fit your personal standards.SergioAwoke (talk) 06:00, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

If you could objectively tell what you need to remove all those 3 tags, I can certainly provide those for you. SergioAwoke (talk) 06:26, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi there. The standards are not my own, but are based on Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and reliable, independent sources (also note that I only added two of the three tags). The text posted below (Welcome!) is a template with automatic text regarding possible conflict of interest, and I did not tailor it in anyway, so my apologies if it is not 100% applicable to your situation. Most of the references in your article are direct links to sites that sell or offer the game, and as such, are not reliable, third-party sources about the game. The AppsCampus reference, for instance, merely suggests the topic's existence, saying nothing of the topic itself, and appears as unduly promotional or extraneous. Please read Wikipedia's general notability guidelines, as well as the links in the article tags. The best way to improve the article would be to not cite affiliated sources as references, and rather, state what reliable, non-affiliated sources say, about it (you seem to have a few in your "External links" section, and might consider replacing some of your references with them to demonstrate notability, read also External links). By only referencing sources that offer the game for download (and hence profit by ad revenue), you risk biasing the article towards only positive coverage. If there is significant negative coverage, that also needs to be included, per Wikipedia' neutral point of view policy. If there is no significant, non-trivial, independent coverage, the topic may not meet notability requirements, and may be considered for deletion. In short, don't rely on any affiliated, promotional sources, and your article will not appear promotional or biased. Cheers, --Animalparty-- (talk) 01:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

OK. I'll find new references that meet these criteria. Can I use non-english sources? SergioAwoke (talk) 04:11, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Non-English sources are allowed, but English sources are preferred. See WP:NONENG for more details.--Animalparty-- (talk) 01:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, SergioAwoke, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Phoenix Force (Game), which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Animalparty-- (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phoenix Force concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phoenix Force, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phoenix Force


Hello SergioAwoke. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Phoenix Force".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phoenix Force (game)


The article Phoenix Force (game) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The1337gamer (talk) 11:00, 27 September 2015 (UTC)