User talk:SergioPizzulo

December 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Dick Ellis. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Saying "Any undos are just petty and malicious" is not within the spirit of assuming good faith. JeffUK (talk) 16:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * It is not 'good faith' when an editor, Adakiko, continually undos sensible edits for a perfectly justified addition to an article.
 * Here is several instances of Charles Howard 'Dick' Ellis being called thus:
 * https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/ellis-charles-howard-dick-10113
 * https://spartacus-educational.com/SPYellisCH.htm
 * https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/4505449 SergioPizzulo (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Yep, his nickname is "Dick". Just as the title and first sentence of the article Dick Ellis state. Wikipedia has a wp:Manual of Style. Please follow it to some degree. Just because other articles don't follow the MoS, doesn't give you freerain to do what ever you want. Suggested reading: WP:NICKNAME and WP:WHATABOUT. Adakiko (talk) 19:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Dick Ellis. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 19:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Dick Ellis. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 19:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.