User talk:Sergio Skol

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1964 Little All-America college football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Otis Taylor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Minnesota–Penn State football rivalry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minnesota–Penn State football rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Minnesota–Penn State football rivalry& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Let&#39;srun (talk) 20:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Minnesota–Penn State football rivalry. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C)  20:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2024 Simpson Red Hawks football team


The article 2024 Simpson Red Hawks football team has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sourcing does not meet the criteria set by WP:NTEAM; coverage is limited to primary sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let&#39;srun (talk) 00:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Playoff records
Hi Sergio, hope all is well. Going to sleep now, but just wanted to run this by you. I saw that the playoff/postseason records, along with the Super Bowl, are no longer kept in the infobox. Honestly, nobody reverted what you did, so I've been editing ones that I see also. You might want to tackle Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce. Only because I see that they have references for everything. I can delete things with the best of them... but I can make a big mess also, lol. It's not fair to keep some records for some and not others. If you already thought about this earlier, please share it with me. I'll be here Sunday night. Regards, Bringingthewood (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi! Everything's great, I also hope you're having a nice time
 * Answering your question, yeah, it's unfair keep playoff/SB records just for some.
 * Not all needs to be displayed on the infoboxes, we could add a  section, where we could include all of them. Because adding every single record would mean write something like: "first player to receive 1,400+ yards and 17+ touchdowns with fewest receptions in NFL history", and I think nobody will ever care about a record like it.
 * Mahomes and Kelce now are two of the most popular players in the history, so many editors want to add every single thing about them, including admins. They forget we should keep neutral when editing, and that's why their pages include many irrelevant things.
 * I've always thought that playoff records are unfair enough to be on the infoboxes. Why? Because this is a sport team, e.g. Dick Butkus was a incredible MLB, but he never played in the postseason. He wasn't the guilty for the Bears bad football team. So we shouldn't add that type of records on boxes. (P.S. Please tag me when you reply) Sergio Skol (talk) 14:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Sergio Skol. Good to hear that and I am, thanks. Not sure if you meant to ping you when responding. Your page should automatically turn your bell red upon messaging, I think. I don't know too much anyway. I hear all that you're saying, and I was going to ask you earlier if you got a consensus on this. I also figured that if someone saw what you did .. and didn't agree, like the Jerry Rice page, it would have been removed from the template by now. All my edits were reverted, I'm going to stop for the time being. Too hot to ruffle feathers at the moment, lol. We'll see where this takes us. It kind of reminds me of the 'official' sack deal with no consensus, but another editor, over the months, added about 100 pre-1982 sacks to pages. It's too late to change it now. I'm kind of giving up on pages being consistent. Well, enjoy your summer! Bringingthewood (talk) 21:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello again, Sergio. Saying this as a friend, it's good to get a consensus with the current subject. I've seen it in the past. I'm all for deleting things, but a consensus clears the air at times .. myself, I always hated having to ask permission to take a piss, you know what I mean? But with a template and all the editors out there, it's definitely the right thing to do. Bringingthewood (talk) 02:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Sergio Skol: For what it's worth, I feel very mixed on the subject, but I was also going to revert your change to WP:NFLINFOBOXNOT when I saw it, before realizing someone else already had. While I don't feel strongly either way, I am generally in favour of less infobox clutter. Never the less, I do believe it should be discussed at WT:NFL before it to the player page format, with a mention of the discussion left at Template:Infobox NFL biography. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2024 William Woods Owls football team


The article 2024 William Woods Owls football team has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Subject does not meet the WP:NSEASONS or WP:GNG. All coverage is primary."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let&#39;srun (talk) 11:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Big 12
Hi Sergio, I noticed your edits in several articles of Pac-12 football teams that are moving to the Big 12, including the one for Colorado. I don't think we should say that these teams are in the Big 12 yet, no official announcement on them has been made, either from the Big 12 or the individual teams. The Big 12 website doesn't show the logos of the four future teams from the Pac-12 and all four of those teams still have the Pac-12 logo on their websites as of now. These teams aren't joining the Big 12 until August 2 so I think it's best to still say that these teams are in the Pac-12. Colohisto (talk) 00:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)