User talk:Sergivs

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --PaxEquilibrium 23:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Italics
Hi. Please see WP:MOSITALICS; the bottom line is, it's fairly irrelevant what's the status of the Latin alphabet in Serbia—since "Beograd" is a foreign title to English speakers, it should be italicized. In the past, we also italicized Cyrillic, Greek and similar alphabets in those contexts, but that practice was abandoned, for reasons of accessibility. Regards. Duja ► 11:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

But, "Београд" is also a foreign title to English speakers. "Београд" should also be italicized. If you italicize only "Beograd" and leave "Београд" un-italicized, you imply that Latin alphabet does not have equal status as Cyrillic, which is not true. So, either italicize BOTH "Београд" and "Beograd" or NONE. Can't have only Latin italicized and Cyrillic not.


 * No, you're looking at it from a wrong perspective: you're examining officialdom of alphabets in Serbian language, which isn't the issue at all. Look at it from the perspective of English (and common writing style in any language). Or, let me put that from Serbian perspective::


 * Atina (Grčki: Αθηνα, Athina) je glavni grad Grčke.
 * Vašington (Engleski: Washington) je glavni grad SAD.
 * Peking (Kineski: 北京, Běijīng ) je glavni grad Kine.


 * Foreign spellings generally go to italic. However, when a foreign term is not in Latin alphabet, the convention is not to italicize it. Why? Because foreign alphabets are already difficult for English speakers, and their italicization only further obscures the original spelling. Yes, it's only a Wikipedia convention or "in-house style" — it might have been chosen differently, and other publication probably have their own rules. But it wasn't. Duja ► 07:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand the point and I have always been aware of it.
 * However, I am talking about changing this policy, because it does not seem correct to me. In this special case, when the native language uses two alphabets of equal status, the alphabets should not be one italicized and the other not, simply because it implies that Cyrillic and Latin alphabets are not equal. And they are.
 * It may be small and irrelevant point for some, but it is actually very important.
 * However, if the policy stays as is, then, I agree with you, it should be used. Thank you for your thoughts, anyway. Sergivs

Image tagging for File:Diploma kj.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Diploma kj.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Diploma kj.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Diploma kj.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:40, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Diploma kj.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Diploma kj.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 07:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)