User talk:Serial Number 54129/Archive 14

Please comment on Talk:Political views of American academics
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political views of American academics. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jabel Mukaber
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jabel Mukaber. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Living dinosaur
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Living dinosaur. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julius Evola
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julius Evola. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of flags by number of colors
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of flags by number of colors. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Żegota
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Żegota. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Afsharid dynasty
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Afsharid dynasty. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Khalistan movement
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Khalistan movement. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Civility in infobox discussions case opened
You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 17, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Pontvallain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Patrimony and David II ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Battle_of_Pontvallain check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Battle_of_Pontvallain?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Uurgh. 🍍  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 09:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Jogi.jewels


A tag has been placed on your user page, User talk:Jogi.jewels, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Cahk (talk) 10:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert de Umfraville
The article Robert de Umfraville you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert de Umfraville for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John de Mowbray, 3rd Duke of Norfolk
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John de Mowbray, 3rd Duke of Norfolk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Minsterworth
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Minsterworth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 14:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Minsterworth
The article John Minsterworth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Minsterworth for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 04:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Cheers. In your own time, of course.  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 18:52, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Minsterworth
The article John Minsterworth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Minsterworth for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 06:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Very sorry to put you out old chap :)    >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 15:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Premature archiving
Please don't. This is an active discussion. Coretheapple (talk) 14:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Explained here; thank you for making a more reasonable point than that in the section above, which does not, of course, endear itself to receiving anything approaching a civil reply. Or even a reply at all. Cheers,  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 15:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Although validation is not a requirement, neither is it unwelcome. Thanks, all.  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 11:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not validation. The subject of this note was your archiving, not the merits of your position. Coretheapple (talk) 18:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Just so; it was estblished that it was not in fact an active discussion. That suffices, and I thank you for your note.  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 18:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dolly Rudeman
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dolly Rudeman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 03:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Pontvallain
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Pontvallain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alex Shih -- Alex Shih (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, thank yooou Mr. Alex ;) in your own time of course.   >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 15:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radmin (February 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Radmin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Radmin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Radmin Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Radmin reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Excellent news,, thanks vry much. The system works.  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 21:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)


 * No worries; the topic itself may be valid, but it's hard to tell since the bulk of the citations are to the company itself, their forum, their manuals, etc. Bluntly, we don't care what a company says about itself, we care what outside experts have to say about it. Detailed explanations of a product line, with no indication these details are taking the media by storm, are usually big red flags that a page is an advert rather than a neutral description. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Quite :) Happy editing! ;)   >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 21:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * My bust, I thought you were the originator since you're listed as the Submitter. I was wondering why such a draft from an experienced editor. Ah well, back to the salt mines go I. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ultimograph5 -- Ultimograph5 (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal
The article Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ultimograph5 -- Ultimograph5 (talk) 17:42, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * That's handy 'Arry :)   >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 17:56, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Many thanks; when do we start?  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 14:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It should be relatively soon. I've taken on a number of GAN's (21 at current count), yours are #7, 9, and 11. I should be able to get to them this weekend. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  16:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jean Creton
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jean Creton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Just like the 38—you wait for ages and three come along at once! :)  16:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Peter, Abbot of Vale Royal
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peter, Abbot of Vale Royal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eric Corbett -- Eric Corbett (talk) 20:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Pontvallain
The article Battle of Pontvallain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Pontvallain for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alex Shih -- Alex Shih (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Haroo :) cheers ; like a Guinness, "Worth Waiting For"  :)    >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 16:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Haha, I've got to go to one of these London meetups soon. Alex Shih (talk) 16:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * *hic* :)     >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates

Your GA nomination of William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby
The article William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke
The article John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jean Creton
The article Jean Creton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jean Creton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Blimey
Thanks.  ...SerialNumber 54129 ...speculates 15:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 08:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey
The article Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

External links, not See also
Back in Nov & Dec you cleaned up some additions by User:Genealogyinterest, moving their added ipms to a See Also section. While you were correct that it did not belong in the body, a See Also section is for other relevant Wikipedia pages, not links off-site. If you find yourself making similar corrections in the future please use 'External links' or 'Further reading' headings for links to off-site material. Agricolae (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I accept your thanks,, cheers  —SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 16:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parliament of 1327, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Registrar and Chancery ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Parliament_of_1327 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Parliament_of_1327?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅  —SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 10:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Elizabeth Paston
Hello! Your submission of Elizabeth Paston at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Elizabeth Paston
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Pbsouthwood RfA
Hi 54129,

I didn't ask you to post a question, and if I had intended to ask one I would have done so myself, so could you please remove the misleading "on behalf of" from yours?

Thanks. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 18:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Since you haven't deigned to respond I've struck it myself. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 08:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John/Eleanor Rykener
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John/Eleanor Rykener you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 02:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Claude of France (1547–1575)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Claude of France (1547–1575). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros
The article William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:02, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Darnhall Abbey
The article Darnhall Abbey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Darnhall Abbey for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parliament of 1327
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parliament of 1327 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parliament of 1327
The article Parliament of 1327 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Parliament of 1327 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1385)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article English invasion of Scotland (1385) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

John Fresshe bibliography
Hi, I noticed you removed the author links I added to the bibliography on John Fresshe with the comment "what is the point, when they're mostly red???" Obviously, it's a matter of taste and if you care that much, then do remove them. But the point is that all of those red links are to academics who would pass our notability test and including them aids article creation as outlined at WP:RED. (There was a good article written about this in the Wikipedia Post a few years ago but I can't find it now.) Indeed, I had planned to revisit the page and use those red-links to do just, as I am about to do with Paul Brand (historian). Anyway, I just thought I'd answer your question. Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC).
 * Quite. I couldn't find it either. Cheers! —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 15:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John/Eleanor Rykener
The article John/Eleanor Rykener you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John/Eleanor Rykener for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 22:01, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Cheers ; great review (cf. above!), and many thanks for it. If you're interested, and not Eleanored-out ;) the peer review is open here. Cheers!  —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 11:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Fresshe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Fresshe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Just a bit help
Hi Serial Number 54129. I wrote some articels in german Wikipedia (even some excellent ones, but some years ago). Wanted to do the first try on the english site. Sorry that my english is not perfect. Could you give me some help on Sopro Bauchemie. That would be great. --Frank Winkelmann (talk) 18:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1385)
The article English invasion of Scotland (1385) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:English invasion of Scotland (1385) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't wish to be a stick in a mud, but Jonathan Sumption's book appears to be missing from the "Bibliography" section, so the citations give harv errors. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  23:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Sticks should read page history. The harv errors exist because I began adding the Sumption material after the GA was over, but couldn't be arsed to piss about formatting them at 20:00 UTC.... —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 08:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi
Could you tell me what's going on with your DYK nomination Template:Did you know nominations/John–Eleanor Rykener? It seems to have been deleted from the server. Yoninah (talk) 14:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stateless nation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stateless nation. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy quick!
That was probably the fastest response to a maintenance tag I've ever seen on Wikipedia! I felt bad sticking such an ugly tag on a GA, but I feel vindicated considering the issue was resolved in under ten minutes. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 09:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem, and thanks for noticing...if you look at the GA, it was extremely thorough—yet this was the perfect example of how something can always slip through the net. So I think, frankly, even if it's a FA, a tag still draws necessary attention. Better to look ugly for ten minutes than unintelligible for days :)   —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 09:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julius Evola
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julius Evola. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

The Thing
Hi Serial, have you finished your work on the Thing? I wasn't sure since some refs have links and others have just the author names. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:26, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

I want to give barnstar to these people. You can't revert.
I want to give barnstar to these people. You can't revert.

Ooops!
Sorry for the noise, the thanks that I've just sent you was an accident, I clicked on the wrong tab. Sorry, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem—sorry to hear you weren't just amused at my sardonic critique of...one Chris Green :)  —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 15:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Citizen Cider
We are just trying to get our company a Wikipedia page as we are one of the larger cider producers in New England. This is the second time I’ve attempted to upload, I did not mean to make it bias. What can I do to get a page uploaded? Could you please help! CitizenCiderVT (talk) 17:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Darnhall Abbey
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Darnhall Abbey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this, I'd forgotten this one: so far out of my comfort zone too. I quickly did some essential restructuring, etc/. and unfortunately wiped out you useful edits (I hadn't got an edit-conflict); however, I think I've managed to restore everything you did. Cheers! —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 17:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Re: A barnstar for you
Hello there. Thanks for the barnstar, bro!--Muddyb (talk) 04:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Whats the dogs name
The one in the photo where it's all disoted and too bright to see anything. 💸Money💸emoji💸 💴 16:05, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * At least you got the money emoji symbol right :D  I_  0  ur c lc  5    17:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Peter Matthews (artist)
The article Peter Matthews (artist) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Matthews (artist) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 00:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

damn you jimbo! I will never be able to quit
I guess I won't be able to quit the wiki ever. How are the things around here anyways? Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 11:53, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Still a sucker,  :D good to see you. How's tricks?  —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 16:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Doing pretty good. I am trying to find a single thing to focus on instead of trying everything. Any advice? I am thinking of anti-vandalism or some other work or some other administrative duty. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 17:35, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Your signature definitely went through some modification, didn't it? Cheers, <b style="color: #000000">Friy</b><b style="color: #FFA500">Man</b> Per aspera ad astra 17:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Mentioned..
...over SoWhy's t/p.Ought to have dropped this, hours ago but....Best, ~ Winged Blades Godric 12:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I know, I got 's ping. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap shit room 12:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inbreeding in fish has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Inbreeding in fish, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! » Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  09:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Inbreeding_in_fish help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nuns
Thank you for the post on TonyBallioni's talk page. Would you be aware of any French or Anglo-Norman convents/nuns? - Conservatrix (talk)
 * Thank you for this . Well, we have categories on Category:French Roman Catholic abbesses and Category:French Roman Catholic religious sisters and nuns which should show you what needs expanding, and might again lead to redlinks. Also, catagories on fr.wp might be of use; (fr:Catégorie:Abbesse, for instance is pretty well populated. Some of them are well known, of course, and naturally have articles (as with much of WP the low-hanging fruit has already been picked), but I see a few do not—e.g., Alice of Savoy (Alice de Savoie) and Barbara von Trüllerey of Schänis Abbey. I hope that helps, but this is not particularly my speciality I'm afraid so you probably know more of what to look for than I. Take care!  —SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 16:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Nun come to mind offhand. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 10:54, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I thought I had a big list of them, but when I got to the bottom of the list I realized it was nun of the above. Primefac (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Nun today, thank you.  —SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 16:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Must you guys be so conventional? Please don't make a habit of it. --MelanieN (talk) 16:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey, that was pretty good. For those who take their humor seriously... Why Nuns are Funny. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 16:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Another superior admin, ordering us about...   —SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 16:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Clearly has a vested interest. Primefac (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Nun of you are novices at this pun thing are you? TonyBallioni (talk) 16:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It's one of our bad habits. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 16:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * What did you think would happen if this many editors were cloistered together? Primefac (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Especially if they are professional punners Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * A Nun with a Pun can be a lot of Fun. (Sing to the tune of The Rain in Spain.) --MelanieN (talk) 20:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It saddens me when a usually respected editor engages in such nunsense. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 21:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Enough said. Have a drink on me y'all, or if you want, I can come a visiting. Lourdes  06:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Lourdes have mercy. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 13:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * What a wonderful convention of editors.&#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   16:48, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey
Your stupid dog is so annoying and blocking some of the text in this gigantic talk page. Please consider removing it. Cheers ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 10:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Please sign in with your original account, unless you are a clean start? If so you should acknowledge this on your user page. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 10:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * While I don't agree with the wording, they got a point. Maybe you could set up archiving for this talk page and move the dog to another place where it's less in the way? Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 10:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)


 * They are merely reacting because I have declined two of their recent CSDs. I have n reason whatsoever to encourage bad-faith posting; I wonder, indeed, that you do, albeit perhaps innocently. Cheers, —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 10:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I shouldn't be so uncivil. This account is my original account btw. I am not angry with you declining speedy deletion, one of them is a mistake, another was arguable, I guess. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 11:03, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * As an additional note, I was not conscious and sleepy today, maybe I should leave now. Sorry again. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 11:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm not involved, I just noticed this message and then that parts of the message cannot be read because there is a dog in front of it. Similarly, it took me a while to navigate this talk page with more than 150 posts. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 12:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * And I'm sure you regularly make the same point at—say—EEng (mandatory honourary example), or to be fairer, perhaps your colleagues in the administratura; thinking of, , ...etc. Don't worry, the dog doesn't bite. Take care! —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 14:15, 17 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I didn't see their talk pages, I saw yours. Besides, "what about X?" is not really a convincing argument, is it? Those talk pages are equally annoying due to their length but that does not make them examples you should emulate. After all, I could point out dozens of talk pages (including mine) that are archived regularly. As for the dog, the annoying part is not its existence but the placement, for example, I cannot read the section below completely because of it. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 14:28, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Clearly I disagree; the same question has been pretty comprehensively answered—and pretty robustly answered—above. Incidentally, I wasn't saying other stuff exists, I was observing that you would be arguing from a position of strength if you made similar points elsewhere. For the rest, it may be your screen settings/resolution as suggested in the section above, particularly on a mobile. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 14:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * As it happens, I am archiving some stuff "AWS"—not, I emphasise, because of your moaning :p   —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 14:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Eighty three threads. Woooah. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 14:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Totally could have archived manually (like your talk page follower here), but then I get the gratification of OneClickArchiver... Alex Shih (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry
User:Cyber Nazrul got deleted. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 12:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Aaaand I am now going to tell to undelete it, as I had already declined your misguided tag. You will soon find out that you should not rely on someone who is as busy as RH at the coalface to double-check your work for you; he is under the impression that you know what you are talking about.  —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 12:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Blocked (not requested by me). The account is indeed for promotion only. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 12:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cèllere Codex
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cèllere Codex you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 03:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mumbai
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mumbai. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kashmir under Pakistani Occupation


A tag has been placed on Kashmir under Pakistani Occupation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — kashmīrī  <sup style="font-family:Candara; color:#80F;">TALK  20:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for this. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 09:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Galloway
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Galloway. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jordan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jordan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PRehse (talk) 01:06, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political views of American academics
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political views of American academics. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quneitra Governorate
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quneitra Governorate. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Ƣaznavid dynasty
Hi, thanks to restore speedy for Ƣaznavid dynasty. This is a redirect left after reverting a nonsense page move of earlier today. Redirect should be deleted as speedy, please don't require others to waste their time discussing it. Cheers, — kashmīrī  <sup style="font-family:Candara; color:#80F;">TALK  22:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1385)
The article English invasion of Scotland (1385) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:English invasion of Scotland (1385) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

re Administrators'_noticeboard
Hi Serial Number 54129 (also similar question of ), re Administrators'_noticeboard - the easiest answer here is that the logs represent what "was done" not "what should have been done" and administrative actions should generally be open for community review. If someone is blocked in error, then unblocked the unblocking admin (usually the first one) will generally specify that in the unblocking log entry (and if they don't they can always add a 1 second block to record it later). — xaosflux  Talk 18:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do (really) know why it happens, and more to the point understand why—understanding being greater than knowledge in many cases, and particularly here! I was considering alternate dimensions, that's all :) cheers for the message though. Take care!  —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 18:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Rykener
I left a couple of comments on the FAC before it was archived; don't know if my comments will be useful, but thought I'd let you know in case you missed it. Best of luck with the GAC! Josh Milburn (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the note! I have to apologose for not acknowledging those points. Pwerhaps I was a trifle miffed at the time, who know! As it happens I think I tried to accommodate your suggestion/s with this edit—satisfactory, do you think? But thanks for sticking with it, I appreciate the effort. Perhaps I could ping you when it gets back for a re-run? —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 11:58, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, please do! I'm sure it'll pass at FAC sooner or later, but a topic like this is always going to be tricky; there's hardly a set way to approach articles about the topic, so there's going to be room for reviewers to disagree about your approach. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh- I left some comments after the ones you were responding to there. I'd seen that edit. Not a lot; don't worry about it! Josh Milburn (talk) 18:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

persistent
in this AFD your persistent is linked to village pump persistent pernial problems you know. Do you mean this seriously? Quek157 (talk) 08:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Ha! Well spotted. I must have meant SIGCOV of course; thanks for pointing it out though—I've rectified it, and hope it didn't confuse too many other people! :)   —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 09:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * just wondering why isn't that case bio1e? Quek157 (talk) 10:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:William Bonville, 1st Baron Bonville
Despite your recent peacemaking initiative, this page still seems to be suffering rudeness and obtuseness. Clifford Mill (talk) 11:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Carousel
Module:Carousel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 23:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros
I must apologise for quite unintentionally leaving this article in a mess, which I did mean to tidy but forgot, and must thank you for starting to clean it up. Clifford Mill (talk) 12:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem whatsoever. I must also apologise for the brusqueness of my edit-summary ;)  still, you did do me a favour really, as by drawing my attention back to the article I was able to work it up a little more. It's now been described as "a good, tight, biography with strong FAC prospects," which is positive. Thanks are due to you for creating those circumstanecs—cheers! Take care, and many thanks for the message, appreciated.  —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 12:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

closing
hi, I don't have xfd closer so I had to do manual plus I'm using desktop mode to edit as per normal using my handphone so is really difficult for me to close such things. I am thankful my 7885 Octa still can support such a non mobile mode edit. Thanks for closing.Quek157 (talk) 10:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem, glad everything's ok—I just wasn't sure if you'd forgotten, that's all. Take care! —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 10:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't but as I used manual, the process is almost impossible using a phone. I don't install the script as I don't close Xfd on a regular basis. Quek157 (talk) 10:17, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

List of YouTubers
There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 05:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

JuanRiley
Even though you are right that I shouldn't relish on an editor's block and I agree with your deletion here, I felt I had to make sure JuanRiley didn't come back, he is blocked and for very good reasons. He had been burden for me and many other editors. (N0n3up (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC))

Too late.
Howdy. Now that the Infobox civility case is closed. Editors can't comment on any of the closed cases' talkpages. GoodDay (talk) 13:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I know; which is why I posted subsequently at the notice board. Thank you, for your diligence. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap shit room 13:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Pulp Fiction cast section
The cast section for Ducktech89 (talk) 11:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Please join the talk-page discussion to discuss your edits instead of blindly reverting. Please also desist from foolishness such as this. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap shit room 11:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

The cast section for Pulp Fiction is missing two notable roles, Paul Calderón as Paul and Joseph Pilato as Dean Martin. Both are presented prominently in the end credits but are not represented in the cast section. Even though they are minor roles, I still believe they should have a mention. I hope we can reach an agreement on this issue. Ducktech89 7:34, 23 March 2018 (WAST) Ducktech89 (talk) 11:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Remove Controversies
The article focus on the artist success and it's irrelevant to use it as reference; when the editor only bother to narrow their view into controversies. In wikipedia own words: Since the primary purpose of the Wikipedia is to be a useful reference work, narrow article scopes are to be avoided.

Artificially or unnecessarily restricting the scope of an article to select a particular point of view on a subject area is frowned upon, even if it is the most popular point of view. MrEditor 13:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC) @Serial Number 54129 Remove controversies from the artist Personal Life, given the insufficient references and narrow use of information. MrEditor 14:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You have not said what eit you want making. Nothing to do.  —SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 13:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * >Ping User:MrEditor.  —SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 13:45, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * We'll come to that in a moment—exactly what you are asking for on Camila Cabello is increasingly unclear. Are you the same editor as User:Edpitor who has made a similar (and similarly unclear) edit-request half an hour before you did? And, why do you keep signing yourself as "MrEditor" when User:MrEditor is supposedly someone else? If you could clarify these points please, we can then discuss the edit-request you have made. Many thanks!  —SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 15:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

@Serial Number 54129, I thought we could use a different signature than our profile name. I'm not Edpitor by the way. MrCriticalOP (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

It's ok, you can delete it. You'll never understand. MrCriticalOP (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Another Daily Mail RfC
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Name
Have you actually changed your user name or what? Deb (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Certainly not "what" :) less flamboyant, no?   >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 13:55, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Murder of Kylie Maybury
Hi, can you please look over Murder of Kylie Maybury ? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, Paul Austin, good to hear—hope you're well. Sorry for the belated reply—I was out yesterday afternoon / evening. What am I looking at in that article? I mean, one such as that needs very strong sourcing, and at a cursory glance seems to have it. Got any views on it yourself?  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 10:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

YGM
Please check your inbox:) ~ Winged Blades Godric 15:34, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I disinfect it regularly, officer ;)   >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 15:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Hmm..
Hmm...Just FYI, there's still a 49% that's yuuuge...huh?! copyvio:) ~ Winged Blades Godric  13:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Referencing
I see that you're struggling again with the referencing in John Neville, 1st Marquess of Montagu. In the #Arms section you've got an sfn which starts but doesn't finish, and a ref which finishes without having started. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks David; it's a work in progress atm, and the 'in use' template rather smacks of ownership, no? But we'll see what it looks like at draw of stumps :) thanks for looking out!   >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 15:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Take a look at The Marquess now—slow but sure, just British Rail :)    >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 20:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Male expendability
Did you actually check the Journal articles to verify the term "male expendability"? I have not seen anything with that term, rather it appears to me to be original research. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme 📞📧 14:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 *  >SerialNumber 54129 ...speculates 15:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Interesting...my Google search brought up a variety of terms, including "male disposablity", "disposable male myth", and so on. That's what made me wonder if maybe it was an attempt to coin the phrase. I went to ProjectMed thinking maybe it was a medical or psychological issue, and so far, got this response, so I went to Project Sociology for more input. The title may well be notable enough. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme 📞📧 16:34, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Dolly Rudeman. c.1920-c.1930.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dolly Rudeman. c.1920-c.1930.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Mmmm tagged F1. I enk yow.  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 06:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Neville-Neville feud
Not sure why you removed massive amounts of content from the article to revert to last stable version when there was no activity on the article, I assume it was a good faith error but please be more careful using Twinkle. (Unfortunately I reverted while logged into my alt account on mobile phone so I am leaving you a note about it) SeraphWiki (talk) 10:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Replied on both talk pages, but didn't call them or this, "shitty messages", as well as delighting in the fact that, whilst we probably all wish talk pages could be drama free, the one certain way of reducking drama... is not to cause it. Cheers!   >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 18:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC)