User talk:Serial Number 54129/Archives/2015/June

Hi, there is no reason whatsoever I should delete my Sharon needles photo, it is mine that I took and all copyright is mine which I have stated.

Is there a reference?
You just reverted an edit on Antisemitism with an edit summary "As per TP". Everything that has been presented on the TP indicates the frequent use of the term "anti-Semitism". I don't understand the reference. GregKaye 12:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Chinese
my english is so bad — Preceding unsigned comment added by 李建兴 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Then maybe you should not edit on English wikipedia. Qed237&#160;(talk) 16:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

NPOV at Anthony Watts (blogger)?
I noticed you restored a controversial quote into the lede of this article, commenting "As per WP:NPOV"

Could you please explain how your edit improves NPOV of that article? It would be best to respond at the article talk page, where this controversy is currently being discussed. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 19:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Low IQ
This talk page belongs to a LOW IQ USER — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1014:B02B:FE35:0:48:CD74:FF01 (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Understand your concerns but I do not believe that GiantSnowman is behaving in a fair, balanced and just way - his targeting of the Bantams Banter page is for personal reasons and I am just defending my corner, I trust you have given him the same friendly 'word in the ear'? (RedJulianG40 (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC))

Your GA nomination of James Harrington (Yorkist knight)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article James Harrington (Yorkist knight) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 08:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James Harrington (Yorkist knight)
The article James Harrington (Yorkist knight) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:James Harrington (Yorkist knight) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

United Synagogue
Please can you clarify why the assertions I made on the US.org.uk wiki page are not allowed to stand with this source: http://www.presstv.com/detail/2014/10/12/381997/israel-lobby-to-block-uk-palestine-vote/

which clearly points out that

"The Zionist pressure group "United Synagogue" has called on all its members to press their constituency representatives to reject the motion or make amendments to it

and that

"Meanwhile, Davis Lewin, the Deputy Director and Head of Policy and Research at the Henry Jackson Society (HJS), has hit out at planners of the recognition proposal, describing them as people who openly want to destroy Israel."

Why is this not a quote that is allowed to stand? Internetwikier (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Bizarre wikipedians
Category:Bizarre wikipedians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 11:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Aarthi Aggarwal
It is very difficult to stop Vandalism on this artile. Is there any way to protect the page form IP user edits for a week? - varma (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , Yes I've requested temporary page protection here- so can you if you install WP:TWINKLE in your preferences! Cheers, Fortuna  Imperatrix Mundi  16:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Apologies
Hi. Thanks for your concern. There is no edit war. I have dropped my objection to User:23 editor's edits and they can be safely restored. Upon reflection, I see 23 editor's point. Yours, Quis separabit?  19:15, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--FDrago77 (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Good luck with that- since you have been reported for vandalism. Fortuna  Imperatrix Mundi  12:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Blocked users
Thatip edit u reinstated was a blocked user. I am removing it again per WP:Evade. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

James V. Toner‎
Users are allowed to completely blank pages that they created. They are not allowed to remove speedy deletion tags, except to blank the page, as was the case here. I removed your warning from the user's talkpage, since their edit was valid. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Red Army Faction
I'm very surprised how you wish to make sense of "A family of 4 hunting mushrooms"... But I am willing to be amazed! Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , I've done a little bit. How true it is I have no idea! It does start off sounding a little Hans Christian Anderson doesn't it... Fortuna  Imperatrix Mundi  09:49, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It does make more sense that way. The article is on my to-do list. Once I expand it, I will probably outsource the list into a seperate article and go through all incidents, rephrase them and find sources. But it'll need time... Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Cheers! Yes it will, but it'll be good work. Have you got Vague's Televisionaries, and Smith's two-volume thing? Fortuna  Imperatrix Mundi  09:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't have any English literature so far, just German. But I'll try to get my hands on the Smith volumes. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Can't find my copy atm, but I seem to remember that most of his bibliography was to (not unnaturally!) to German works anyway. good luck. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  10:19, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

User reported
Where has he been reported? <b style="font-family:tahoma"><b style="color:green">Tea</b><b style="color:blue">Lover</b><b style="color:red">1996</b> Talk to me ☏ </b> 16:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry User talk:TeaLover1996, I seem to be getting notifications only intermittently. It was here. Cheers. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  19:43, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

IP at User talk:AGK
Don't bother attempting to reason with the IP. The named account is one of multiple socks they have had blocked over the past few weeks - the IP has conveniently neglected to mention the other named accounts. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Cheers! <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  20:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
You have been blocked for 48 hours for making personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. <b style="color:Chocolate">Chillum</b> 18:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

This is the edit in question:.

This is not acceptable. If you can demonstrate that you understand our no personal attacks policy and are willing to follow it then I can unblock you early. <b style="color:Chocolate">Chillum</b> 18:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your advice- appreciated. On edit: forgot to actually . <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  21:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * .- Mine and another editor's interaction seem to result in a world of whatever at AN/I for you... sorry bout that! <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  19:18, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

I would say your blame in that particular matter is negligible.

I appreciate the mature fashion you have responded and have every expectation that this was an isolated incident. At this point I don't think the block is preventative and am going to lift it. Happy editing. <b style="color:Chocolate">Chillum</b> 19:22, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Understood- many thanks! <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  07:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

User Conduct
Please stop making grossly uncivil comments towards others as you did here. Further instances will result in a block. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 18:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Adam Fry
Once the AfD has been raised and commented on, I think it would confuse the system to delete it, so instead I have closed it as speedy keep, recording that you withdrew the nomination. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:42, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Note individuals who have nothing to say: so they copy other's edit summaries.

??
What are you on about? <b style="font-family:tahoma"><b style="color:green">Tea</b><b style="color:blue">Lover</b><b style="color:red">1996</b> Talk to me ☏ </b> 10:35, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

If I want to remove messages and comments from my talk page then I can. <b style="font-family:tahoma"><b style="color:green">Tea</b><b style="color:blue">Lover</b><b style="color:red">1996</b> Talk to me ☏ </b> 10:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes you can... but then you must expect editors to wonder what you have got to hide. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  10:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I really couldn't care less what other people think. They have their opinions and they're entitled to them, but that doesn't mean I have to agree or care about what they think. <b style="font-family:tahoma"><b style="color:green">Tea</b><b style="color:blue">Lover</b><b style="color:red">1996</b> Talk to me ☏ </b> 10:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * For a start, I would remind you that not caring what people think in a community such as this demonstrates a phenomenally bad attitude. Secondly, you should care, because if you continue to try and deliberately give editors the impression that you have status you do not have, then that behaviour will almost certainly be sanctioned. And another block so soon after your last would doubtless be more severe. Worth your consideration I would think. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  11:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Re: Opinion?
Well, my guess is that this was a some sort of WP:POINT attempt to provoke a reaction from Serbian editors. While I don't have an opinion on these edits one way or the other, it would be quite legitimate to revert them all per WP:BE. GregorB (talk) 11:18, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , Cheers- I was thinking it was probably just being tendentious, but I don't have that specialist knowledge to be certain that it wasn't true or well-sourced. Either way, I'm keeping my eyes open. All the best, <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  11:28, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

How is it innappropiate?
Hello, I know that I have my article Yassine El Hamida is nominated for deletion, but how is it innappropiate?. Before you delete it, tell me on my talk page. Jamie Welford (talk) 16:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Because he doesn't exist? Anyhow, the choice is not mine to make. Cheers! <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  16:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * On edit: He doesn't on WP, anyway. End of conversation. Ciao. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  16:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Jamie Welford
Hello Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Jamie Welford, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I think this version is acceptable in terms of WP:UPYES. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries- too much self-identifiable info though? <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  09:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * He's 19, so I don't think that's a problem; and he is trying to contribute to the encyclopedia, even if has some learning to do, so he isn't the sort of Facebooker U5 is really directed at, who is here only to make a user page. JohnCD (talk) 09:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

WP:AN3
No, that was not supposed to be a sandbox edit or what have you, but a real report. My first one in all these years. Please see the history of Zeybeks and the TP.-- Zz (talk) 11:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Is it a content dispute about their ethnicity? Perhaps you want WP:DRN or something, but that board was for reporting individual editors as edit warriors. I can see you've been at it with User:Mendess55, but be aware that the history makes you look to be on similar level- and possibly also that you both logged out to war as IPs! <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  12:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Naah, I use my own account. As for the IPs, I tried to report that, but at the time being, there was not sufficient activity. Maybe I waited too long, because I tried to get a conversation with Mendes55. WP:DRN sounds good, as I do not feel any desire to "punish" him, but it does not address the point here: there are pretty clear standards for references. I guess a third opinion by a "wikipedia official" should help: somebody just telling to please, please, stick to standards of citing sources and to make sure they are reputable. -- Zz (talk) 12:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

DRN
Not sure where you meant this edit to go. If it was in relation to the Anders Feder subpage case, would you please move it above the tag, since the case is already closed and it may mess up the archive bot if you don't. If that's not the case you were referring to, please move it to the case where you meant it to go. Best regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 14:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC) PS: Non-admin closures aren't really a part of DRN, indeed, administrators aren't really an essential element to DRN and most of us who work there aren't admins (including me). Best regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 14:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Great stuff, many thanks! yeah it was an ec that I ignored there. cheers <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  14:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Socks
Hmm, not sure, you might just be being a bit paranoid - there are lots of football editors around, doesn't mean all of them are socks. Maybe re-raise at SPI if you have a particularly strong feeling. GiantSnowman 18:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Not really- just the timing and the 'unhelpful' nature of the edits. Will keep an eye though, cheers. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  18:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

link
I removed the ext link for Sleepbox because it was dead. I do edits for a reason. 118.93.90.74 (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Why do you keep on putting back a link tha is in the refs? That is not how it works. 118.93.90.74 (talk) 01:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Gamesonomy
Hello Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Gamesonomy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Bots
You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html  This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!


 * The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
 * Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Song
Your name is very similar to a song.-- Cosmic   Emperor  15:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , Indeedy, and with a pretty ancient provenance. My inspiration was possibly just a little less cultured Cheers!  <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  18:10, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Like this also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:39.47.50.14#Note -- Cosmic   Emperor  09:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Trust
Just because a user isn't on my list of users I trust doesn't mean I don't trust them, the list is users I will ask questions the most commonly. That is all. <b style="font-family:tahoma"><b style="color:green">Tea</b><b style="color:blue">Lover</b><b style="color:red">1996</b> Talk to me ☏ </b> 21:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)</>

TeaLover1996
Hello, just so you know if you think TeaLover1996 is a sock, you need to be able to prove it. Calling someone a sock without evidence can be seen as harassment and per WP:OWNTALK he's allowed to remove anything you put on his Talk page. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 22:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your input. Whose feet does he keep warm at night then? If I'm not wrong... <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  22:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You may be right but you have to have the evidence for WP:SPI... JMHamo (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No. Only to go to SPI. The suggestion... is mine. Ciao. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  22:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop_x_nuvola.svg|left|25px|alt=|link=]] Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Please don't make sockpuppet accusations on talk pages or user talk pages, whether you have evidence or not. To do so is often construed as a personal attack. the only venue for sockpuppet accusations is WP:SPI. -- Diannaa (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Correction: It's okay to report obvious duck socks at WP:AIV or on the talk page of an admin familiar with the case. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:54, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Elegant
HiFortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Your diff at AIV did not work, because it was not acutally a diff but a link to a talk page section that had already been deleted. If you want to try an elegant and simple way to create diffs, please consider installing the script at User:Ucucha/duplinks.js. There's also lots of info available at Complete diff and link guide as to how to effectively post diffs that will be robust and will be viewable in pop-ups. -- Diannaa (talk) 00:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Great stuff many thanks! <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  11:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeaLover1996 (talk • contribs) 08:58, June 20, 2015

Note
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <b style="font-family:tahoma"><b style="color:green">Tea</b><b style="color:blue">Lover</b><b style="color:red">1996</b>&#160; ☏ </b> 12:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It might be best if you two just avoided interacting with each other and that includes not posting on each other's talk pages except for required notices. If another editor is acting out of line, let someone who is uninvolved post an appropriate notice. Liz  <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><b style="color:#006400;">Read!</b> <b style="color:#006400;">Talk!</b> 15:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Liz here. You two have been templating each other and hurling accusations and it has to stop. Please get back to improving articles now, -- Diannaa (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, please don't change other people's talk page posts . It is considered disruptive and can get you blocked. -- Diannaa (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I rather think the user is achieving that for himself... still I appreciate you're concern for the project. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  20:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)