User talk:Serilei

Speedy deletion nomination of Super smash brothers universe


A tag has been placed on Super smash brothers universe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Rorshacma (talk) 22:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Super smash brothers universe. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Super smash brothers universe has been deleted, as it appeared to serve no purpose other than promoting a game. However, even if it had been written in less promotional terms, it would have been deleted before long, as it was totally unsuitable as an encyclopaedia article. It was written in incoherent English, frequently using fragments which were not sentences. It contained advice or instructions to readers. It gave no sources, and appeared to be a personal essay, describing your own reflections on the subject, rather than an objective account. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)